Strangely working f...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

MAY 4 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta44 has been released !

New improved internal memory controls should now work on all computers

May 1 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta43 has been released !

Improved internal memory controls (much more stable and faster on big datasets), fixed CPU image viewer, fixed Narrowband extraction demosaic algortihms.

Apr 29 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta42 has been released !

New improved Normalization engine, Fixed random crashes in integration, fixed RGB Combine & Calibrate Star Colors, fixed Narrowband extraction algorithms, new development platform with performance gains, bug fixes in the tools, etc...

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Strangely working flats

8 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,421 Views
(@burkle1990)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter  

Hi APP folks,

As Ive had APP for quite some time IVe grown to stacking with the software. However ever since I upgraded to a newton (800mm f4 GSO + GPU coma corrector with canon 6d.) my flats don't work anymore. They either overcompensate the dust spots, or add a black bar. The latter is the most anoying because it adds a lot of gradients. I really don't know where to start from this point so Ive added some examples.

The first is the result

The second is actual data, you can see there's actual data in the lower bar.

Thanks in advance.

Dennis

orion strange calibration 1
orion strange calibration 2

 


This topic was modified 5 years ago by Dennis van Burk

   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Oeh, that's pretty dramatic. Could you explain your exact workflow when taking flats?

And, how does the data look like when you don't use the flats and use light pollution correction?



   
ReplyQuote
(@burkle1990)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod 

Hello Vincent, thanks for your response.

1. My workflow taking flats is > Canon 6D in AV mode > Geoptik lightbox on top of my tube > Take 20-30 flats in 3 different stops (-1, 0 and +1). The -1 corrects the dustspots, the 0 and +1 stops overcompensate the dustspots.

2. The frame is filled with very anoying dust spots then and contrast loss, really a loss of immersion. I've added a unedited stacked frame where flats failed, and a equalised stacked frame to see the dust spots.

stacked orion 1
stacked orion 1 equalized

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Ah ok, thanks for explaining! So, you are using the RAW data from the DSLR right? Also, I would check the histogram of the flats to determine the exposure. You don't want to be too low or too high, clipping the data. So when you load 1 flat-sub, you can see the histogram on the top-right. Go down to the drop-down menu for the stretch preset (standard it says 15%), and select "no stretch" there. Then you'll see the actual peak of the flat histogram as it was taken. That should be roughly in the middle, it's not very important to get it exactly there, it just has to be away from the extremes (either low or high). Can you check?



   
ReplyQuote
(@burkle1990)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter  

Hi,

1. Yes I'm using raw image files.

2. I've checked the flats and indeed the -1 flats are off. Ive added a screenshot for elaboration. Actually all my flats are off, since i've got no way to make new flats (tube dissambly for maintenance), is there a way to get the histogram in the middle in the old flats? 

Thanks in Advance.

flats1

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Unfortunately not, the data is the way it is already. But looking at the peak, it should be fine actually, it doesn't have to be in the middle, it should be away from the left or right extremes.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

So are you using proper bias or darkflats as well to calibrate the flats?



   
ReplyQuote
(@burkle1990)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter  

About the flats, its noted and I will test it next time I get a chance.

About the bias, im using some old bias frames I could actually make new ones and see if that works. And APP doesnt calibrate at all if you dont supply bias frames.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: