Channel integration...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

2023-03-15: APP 2.0.0-beta14 has been released !

IMPROVED FRAME LIST, sorting on column header click and you can move the columns now which will be preserved between restarts.

 

We are very close now to  releasing APP 2.0.0 stable with a complete printable manual...

 

Astro Pixel Processor Windows 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Intel 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Apple M Silicon 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux DEB 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux RPM 64-bit

Channel integration is ruined when adding new channels

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Likes
342 Views
(@assafh)
Molecular Cloud
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2
Topic starter  

I am imaging M57 with different filters, both narrowband and wideband.

When I integrate my Ha 3nm channel only, I get a good result, with good dynamic range showing gradients and details (see attached image).

M57 Ha only

But when I add to the project the other two channels, which has a significantly stronger signal (Green and Oiii-7nm) - I get a very bad integration of the original Ha data (integrated separately of course) - it is "flat" with almost no gradients and details

(see attached image).

M57 Ha with stronger channels aside

My understanding was that I should get an identical outcome of this channel, but it seems to me that the Ha processing is somehow influenced by the other channels (normalization perhaps?) that were added. I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong that is causing that and what I should do in order to change that. Your assistance is appreciated.

Thanks, 

Assaf

(P.S. I am working with version 1.083 beta)

This topic was modified 11 months ago 4 times by Assaf Hochberg

   
ReplyQuote
Topic Tags
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2102
 

@assafh Please try at least the latest stable release (1.083.4 for Windows or 1.083.2 for Linux/macOS) or the 2.0.0-beta1 and see if the issue remains. Many bugs were solved since then, including bugs that may explain the behaviour you see.


   
ReplyQuote
Share: