Flats don't work ri...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

2026-10-09 APP 2.0.0-beta48 has been released !

This is mainly a bug fix release for the reported bugs in beta47. In addition it has a significant User Interface performance improvement noticable when you need to process 1000s of images in APP.

2026-10-03 APP 2.0.0-beta47 has been released !

This is a very big release... many code optimizations/rewrites, many parts of APP are much faster and more precise, especially star analysis and registration are much faster ! Big mosaics will go much faster 🙂

And we introduce a new preview filter, which includes the new Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch and a General Levels Stretch, this has been long over due. The old preview filter (the panel on the right side to stretch and preview your data) has not been updated for a couple of years and it is a critical part of any APP session.

Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch or ADSS is a much more intuitive stretch algorithm. It is also color preserving (which is a great new addition in itself ! ) which means that the highlights are no longer bleached, color is maintained from the linear data while stretching. You can simply stretch your data using the sky background level and signal width sliders which work much easier and more intuitive. You no longer need to fiddle with the old complicated sliders with zoom buttons. All the zoom buttons for the sliders are made redundant. And you can enter slider values in the slider value fields yourself. I will make a youtube video in the coming days to explain and fully introduce ADSS. Once the video is ready, it will be highlighted on the forum.

RGB Combine upgrade !. The RGB Combine Tool has been rewritten mostly. The tool is faster and easier to use and most importantly, the Luminance slider to inject a luminance channel or channels into the RGB composite is now working correctly. It no longer bleaches the RGB colors. Combined with the new ADSS preview, you will get much better and easier great composites with great color! I will also explain this in a new youtube video.

Flats don't work right all of a sudden

8 Posts
4 Users
2 Reactions
632 Views
(@maxthebuilder)
Red Giant
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 49
Topic starter  

Hello,

This is not necessarily APP issue since I got the same result with Siril.
I decided to post here nonetheless since I didn't get anything helpful at Cludynights.

Got a new ASI2600MC camera to replace the one which just died (also ASI2600MC).

Collected Bias, Dark and Flat correction frames and composed Masters (in APP).

Used those correction Masters for 3 targets over four nights.

Worked OK.

With the 4th target I decided to collect new Flats.

To my surprise they didn't work right.

Old Flats still work OK.

New flats don't work with any of those 4 targets.

Same software (APP), same scope (RC6), same flat panel and brightness, same exposure time.
Same everything but the result is very different.

Tried different exposures, new Bias and even DarkFlats - same outcome.

The only peculiar thing about this: everything is 2x2 binned.
I don't normally do this but had to match binning with the Splinter galaxy I shot in 2023.

Integration with old flats:

ngc3938 50fr St sm

Integration with new flats:

ngc393850fr bias flats St sm

Stretched in APP (15% BG, 3 sigma, 2.5 base).

Any ideas?

Thanks!

Max



   
ReplyQuote
(@connor231)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 152
 

Max

I don't have a good answer for you, but I can offer some comments.

First - if you look closely, the first image has the exact same issue as the second - its just a lot fainter. So there's probably something wrong with both the old and the new flats - its not a new problem.

I have seen something similar before, and I never completely got to the bottom of it. But my working theory is that it is caused by internal reflections on the interior wall of the scope. I suspect that it is because the light from the flat panel is not coming in parallel. Instead, the light from one side of the panel bounces off the other side of the scope and creates a circular distortion that is different to the light path of a distant object (stars).  In support of this - you can see the the effect of the spider support for the secondary. Its clear that most telescope geometries do not significantly suffer from this. Perhaps your rc6 is an exception.

If this idea is right then a solution may involve changing the light source for the flats so that the light comes in in a more parallel way. Perhaps move the panel further from the scope (maybe with a dew shield), or try sky flats. If you choose to try this and it does work I'd be interested in hearing back from you.

Remember, this idea is unproven and I may be completely wrong. If anyone has a better idea I'd like to hear it.

regards

JC


This post was modified 5 months ago by John Connor

   
ReplyQuote
(@astrogee)
Black Hole
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 243
 

I noticed that it doesn't work to do your flats at the end of a dew shield - maybe more chance for reflections. Your flat panel should be directly applied to the OTA entrance.



   
John Connor reacted
ReplyQuote
(@connor231)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 152
 

@astrogee

You may well be right. I'm certainly not confident that my idea is correct - but it does give Max (@maxthebuilder) something he can test. I hope he can let us know if it succeeds or fails - either way that may be useful information.

JC



   
ReplyQuote
(@maxthebuilder)
Red Giant
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 49
Topic starter  

Yes, those are reflections inside the tube and also from the secondary mirror spider.

That's exactly what flats are supposed to take care of (besides dust motes, etc.).

I don't use a dew shield.
I place the flat panel exactly the same way every time.
Use same brightness and about  the same exposure time every time. For years.

I actually suspect that my acquisition software (INDI/Ekos) might not handle 2x2 binning 100% correctly.
Once I switched back to 1x1 binning - everything was back to normal.

Thanks guys for your replies!



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 5468
 

Hi Max @maxthebuilder,

I read the entire topic, to me this seems likely to be a software capture issue with camera control somehow on shooting 2x2 binning, maybe something goes wrong with the sensor bias level. The bad or worse result with the bin2x2 data looks like, in my eyes, a sensor offset issue where the flats, bias, flat darks are not compatible with the lights.

The report that the issue goes away when using bin1x1 leads me to think that there is a problem here in INDI/Ekos, but it can be useful for me to have a look at the bin2x2 data as well. Maybe there is something in the data or fits header that we can use to adjust the scaling/normalization of the flats and then the problem might be solved from APP's end.

Can you upload the data here:

https://upload.astropixelprocessor.com/

username: uploadData

password: uploadTestData

Please make a folder with your name and issue like:  Max-Flat-bin2-issue

and upload the data there and let me know once done.

@connor231 & @astrogee thanks for your assistance !

Thanks,

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
(@maxthebuilder)
Red Giant
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 49
Topic starter  

Mabula - thanks!

Added few frames to> https://upload.astropixelprocessor.com/

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 5468
 

Thanks Max,

I will have a look and will get back to you when I know more 😉

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
Share: