I'm about to shoot ...
 
Share:

The problem with the data upload limit for attachments has been fixed. I have restored it to 30MegaBytes. A recent forum software upgrade was responsible for the changed limit. Please accept my apologies for missing this when upgrading the forum sofware, Mabula.

I'm about to shoot an all-sky mosaic  

  RSS

(@ddnum)
Molecular Cloud Customer
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 3
08/03/2019 7:13 am  

I'm about to shoot an all-sky mosaic using a computer controlled equatorial mount. I can specify alt-azimuth coordinates in degrees and the software does the rest.

I was wondering what are the optimal alt-azimuth values to specify to get the best results from APP.

This is a tricky mosaic to stitch for panorama software because the camera rotates so it is never horizontal in relation to the ground. But I'm reasonably sure APP can handle that.

Another issue is that I don't really know how to uniformly spread alt-azimuth values uniformly over a sphere. But I'll figure that out. In the meantime I might just rotate azimuth from 0 to 360 and altitude from 0 to 90. It will get quite squished near the zenith. Is that a challenge for APP?

This topic was modified 6 months ago by Mabula Haverkamp - Admin

ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Quasar Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2120
10/03/2019 5:48 pm  

Hi @ddnum,

Indeed, APP can register widefield data 😉 with a very large field of view. For example this 180 degree mosaic, shot at 14mm focal length:

In your case, the field of view will be larger than 120 degrees, since you mention an all-sky mosaic.

In that case, you must use the calibrated projective registration mode in 4). The calibration enables a different data projection than the default rectilinear projection. A rectilinear projection will never work with a field of view larger than 120 degrees.

I was wondering what are the optimal alt-azimuth values to specify to get the best results from APP.

There aren't, but I would recommend enough overlap between the mosaic panels, with more overlap, the result will be more robust. So 20% overlap will give you a much higher chance of a good result than 10% overlap 😉

Another issue is that I don't really know how to uniformly spread alt-azimuth values uniformly over a sphere. But I'll figure that out. In the meantime I might just rotate azimuth from 0 to 360 and altitude from 0 to 90. It will get quite squished near the zenith. Is that a challenge for APP?

APP can handle that, this is a 30 panel mosaic surrounding polaris (data courtesy of Scott Rosen @scott_rosen ) shot with 2 different camera's:

Do let me know if you need assistance when you are starting to process the data 😉 . I have been working on a big upgrade of the registration engine as well to also further improve and speed-up mosaic registration and to add more data projections like sperical.

Kind regards,

Mabula

This post was modified 6 months ago 2 times by Mabula Haverkamp - Admin

Main developer of Astro Pixel Processor and owner of Aries Productions


ReplyQuote
(@ddnum)
Molecular Cloud Customer
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 3
10/03/2019 9:50 pm  

Thanks for the reply. I'm going to shoot 21 images at the vertices of an icosahedron. I'm doing the calculations to see if there will be enough overlap.

Where the images overlap does APP integrate the pixels? If each panel is a stack of 4 images does the overlapped area have the SNR ratio of 8 images? If that is the case then I can really go hard on the overlapping area knowing that it increases my SNR ratio so no pixels are wasted.


ReplyQuote
Share: