Always vignetting p...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

15th Feb 2024: Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta29 released - macOS native File Chooser, macOS CMD-Q fixed, read-only Fits on network fixed and other bug fixes

7th December 2023:  added payment option Alipay to purchase Astro Pixel Processor from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and other countries where Alipay is used.

 

Always vignetting present after integration, flat frames not used?

2 Posts
2 Users
1 Likes
2,778 Views
(@arnom)
Brown Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 2
Topic starter  

Hello Mabula

Using your and Sara's tutorials are very usefull in getting APP working for me. But there is 1 thing that keeps showing, whatever I do. Even when I was with another APP user he claimed he also gets the same result: vignetting very visible in the integrated picture, eventhough there were flats used. Even with the master flat, master bias and bpm correction frames loaded with the lights, all results are with very visible vignetting.

Recently I tried a dataset from someone else with better and more experience with making astropictures and in a low-lightpollution area (very different from mine) I get very visible vignetting. Usually I tried to correct this with the vignetting correction tool, but as I read in the forum, it is not built for integrated frames.

Can you assist me in how I can integrate my lights without getting the vignetting visible after integration.

 

Because there are a lot of questions about the correct vignetting tool, I suspect a lot more people have the same issue about the vignetting nog being removed with integration.

 

Thnx in advance for your reply.

Regards

ArnoM

M33 Petra integrate

   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Hi @ArnoM,

Thank you for your question and welcome to the APP forum 😉

If vignetting still shows in your integration, while flats are applied then I suspect that you (and your fellow APP user) are following a wrong or incomplete calibration path.

Luckily, we should be able to solve this easily ;-).

The issue that you face is documented in the calibration rules, which you can find here:

https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/tutorials-workflows/astronomical-data-calibration-priciples-must-read/

A common mistake is to not calibrate both the flats and lights 1 time (and 1 time only) with either bias or darks. Your flats need to be calibrated with a masterbias or masterdark, and so do your lights. Otherwise, the bias pedestal is not removed in either flats or lights giving a failed flat-field calibration.

So, please read my first post in the link above and let me know if this is clear to you.

And please share the details of how you calibrated your lights and flats, what kind of exposure times and iso/gain values were used in the lights and all of the calibration  frames?

Example of working flat-field calibration, a linear and a calibrated light frame:

GUI IV l calibrated
GUI IV linear

Did you verify if calibration was working correctly before you started with 3) analyse stars and further? Always try to do that (will save you time 😉 ) with the linear-calibrated image viewer mode (can be found in dropdown box at the top of the image viewer).

Regarding the vignetting tool:

https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/community/tutorials-workflows/how-to-correct-a-stackintegration-for-vignetting/

So only use this tool if you don't have flats or fail to make good flats. It is only to be used on data that hasn't had flat-field correction from applying flats. And I would always advise to try to make your flats as good as you can. So the correct vignetting tool should be regarded as an option only if you can't make flats or haven't made them yet... 😉

Kind regards,

Mabula

 

 

 


   
Paul Muller reacted
ReplyQuote
Share: