UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hello from Austria!
Â
I have reworked the data that was made during this year's trip to America.
Â
Location: Bryce Canyon (Bortle 1)
Â
Â
Â
Full quality: https://www.astrobin.com/kdaqyt/?nc=user
Â
This time I used APP for stacking and calibrating the pics and Starnet++ (new in the workflow) to edit the nebulae and the stars separately. The final tweaks were made in Photoshop.
Â
Thanks to @jw_duijndamhetnet-nl and @kijja for the technical help 🙂
Â
I'm looking forward to your feedback!
Â
CS Gernot
Tip for others; opening the image above in a new tab also gives a better resolution to view.
I think the amount of data is amazing, clearly those skies work. 🙂 If I may and hit on a few points? I notice that the nebula has some spotty pattern, could it be a bit over-stretched? This also seems to be the case looking at the background around the stars.
I know what you mean Vincent. When I remove the stars from the image with Starnet ++ you get a very noisy result. Maybe you have to smooth the starless picture ...!?
Do you have any idea how to solve the problem?
I would be interested anyway what a PRO could get out of this stack 🙂
CS Gernot
I'm no pro, but would love to give it a go. I do have extremely bad Internet where I am now, so downloading will take a while. Personally I'm a fan of not too many tricks with software, the data is what it is and if you really need to use other things to kind of "boost" a result, my take would be to just take more data. 😉 But that's personal, I'd like to see what can be done still and thanks for offering to do that.
I'm very curious what you make of my data 🙂 I understand your approach that is also good, because otherwise all pictures would look the same!
Â
Here is the stack:Â
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lejQi18FL-0NlBh55dOCepqeS4uF0gM4?usp=sharing
Â
CS GernotÂ
Thank you Gernot! I'll just start the download and see you back in a year. 😉 It's slow, but we'll see.
ps. Would it also be possible to get a masterdark, flat and bias? And then a subset of the raw light frames? With only the final integration I can't play as much.
@vincent-mod
I will send you a link in the evening!
CS GernotÂ
Yes, excellent! I actually tried myself, but gave up as I couldn't "quickly" get anywhere near your result. I don't use photoshop, so I guess there are some nice tricks done in there. 🙂
Here is the final version :
Â
Â
Â
Full quality:
https://www.astrobin.com/kdaqyt/B/
Â
Thank you for your honest feedback @vincent-mod . It helped a lot with the reworking of the picture.
Â
CS GernotÂ
Thank you 🙂
Â
@all
Â
I've made some minor changes in the colors 🙂
Â
https://www.astrobin.com/kdaqyt/C/?nc=user
Â
CS
Â
Gernot
Â
Â


