UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hello from Austria!
Here is my latest project
Canon 6D(a) - Lacerta 72/432 APO - Fornax Lightrack II - Optolong L Pro
Nebula: 49x 120 sec. / F5.9 / ISO 1600
Center: 24x 12 sec. / F5.9 / ISO 1600
Full quality:Â https://www.astrobin.com/391593/?nc=user
Please give me feedback 😀
CS
GernotÂ
Â
Hi Gernot @skanker,
Great Orion Nebula 😉 !
You have captured a lot of signal here in s hort time, nice job 🙂
Best feedback I can give right now is probably to try and add more data, for only 100 minutes of exposure time this is great, but perhaps with 4-8 hours the quality of the weaker nebulosity will be better as well 😉
Did you create a HDR in Photoshop, or did you let APP integrate the long and short exposures together ?
Cheers,
Mabula
Hello Mabula!
Thank you for your feedback... I'm very happy with the result 🙂
I have created the HDR in Photoshop ( layering two stacks made with APP). Does APP support this process?
Cheers
Gernot
Hello Mabula!
Thank you for your feedback... I'm very happy with the result 🙂
I have created the HDR in Photoshop ( layering two stacks made with APP). Does APP support this process?
Cheers
Gernot
Hi Gernot @skanker,
You can integrate the different exposure times in APP at the same time, that is no problem and it will give you more depth in the result. Using different integration weights is key here, with star shape weights, you usually get the best protection of the highlight areas for an object like this.
Making a HDR combination like you did in Photoshop is on my ToDo list, so that will come to APP as well.
Kind regards,
Mabula
This didn't work for me on Andromeda, unless I am doing something fundamentally wrong. I have taken subs at 30S, 60S and 90S, but when loading them all up in APP, it produces a session1+2+3 stack which has blown out the core, when I look at each session stack individually, they all look similar, but when I create each stack seperately (Load up, stack, clear, load up stack, clear.....) I get different results, the 30S is not as blown out or as bright as when I process them as three seperate sessions within the same process job
@stastro, Simon, like Vincent indicate, did you try different integration weights like the star shape ?
Maybe for your data, setup, you need more shorter exposures even. How does the 30s stack look like?
Â
All three combined (As session 1, 2 and 3) in APP:
The three Stacked separately in APP and then HDRComposition performed in PI:
Exact same processing steps in both images (Image processing container with same settings) in PixInsight, you can see the first one lacks detail, and has the core blown completely, the 2nd one is much better
Â
Regards
Simon
Lovely! Dust is always tricky, so nicely done!




