Share:
Notifications
Clear all

2022-05-29: APP 2.0.0-beta2 has been released !

Release notes

Download links per platform:

windows 2.0.0-beta2

macOS x86_64 2.0.0-beta2

macOS arm64 M1 2.0.0-beta2

Linux DEB 2.0.0-beta2

Linux RPM 2.0.0-beta2

Very challenging image set - faint comet, bright stars, near horizon, twilight starting


(@tomkrajci)
Brown Dwarf Customer
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 14
Topic starter  

(If you want this image set for test/evaluation purposes, I'm happy to provide.)

Comet 22P Kopf in the morning sky as twilight starts.

Sony a6300, 200mm, f/2.8, 20-second exposures, ISO 6400, stack of 77 frames.

First screen grab is a very tight crop on the final stack. The comet (approx mag 12) is the small, slightly smeared green smudge in the center.

Screenshot 2022 03 14 094021

 

I did not even attempt to align/register on the comet because...

Second screen grab is a single calibrated image. The comet might be visible as a slight increase in sky background, but it's bracketed by two brighter stars. I don't think any automated routine will centroid on the comet, so I just aligned on the stars. (I wish I had some sort of manual comet stacking capability where I tell APP the drift rate of the comet in pixels per minute of time, and rely on the time stamp of the individual files.)

Screenshot 2022 03 14 093321

 

Third image is a wider view. Comet is just left of center. Note how uneven the sky background is. Down low there is more skyglow/natural sky brightness, and light pollution, and the glare from above is because Venus is just above the edge of the frame.

 

2022 03 14 22P Kopf St

 

Fourth screen grab shows what Astro Pixel Processor can do to flatten out the sky background. Pretty good, but I don't know why the color saturation has also been pulled to near zero. (I was also testing the 'calibrate star color' routine because the stars have an overall slight green tint after normalizing to create a neutral background.)

Screenshot 2022 03 14 100217

This is a challenging set of data on which to properly stack a comet, to get color 'correct', and deal with the light gradients from natural and man made light sources. I'm not even close to getting these things corrected.

Fifth image is the entire frame that the 200mm lens covers. The comet is almost impossible to spot a bit left and above center.

2022 03 14 22P Kopf entire St

Last screen grab is from planetarium software. When I started the imaging run the comet was only about 6 degrees above the horizon. I kept taking images for 25 minutes until the sun was at about -16 degrees.

Screenshot 2022 03 14 055804

This imaging run was a test to see what results I can get with a comet that's close to the sun. The comet is low in the sky, and I have a short time to get images before twilight puts an end to it. I chose the 200mm lens because it's one stop faster than the 300mm.

Again, I'm happy to provide this image set if you think it will help test and improve APP's capabilities.


ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Quasar Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4830
 

Yes please. 🙂 Every dataset that throws a challenge is welcome as we can indeed use it, to see if we can maken APP work with it. You can upload it in the same folder you had if you want. Much appreciated!


ReplyQuote
(@tomkrajci)
Brown Dwarf Customer
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 14
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod Images uploaded.

image

 


ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Quasar Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4830
 

Superb, thank you very much! I've placed your data in our comet-test folder to be analyzed.


ReplyQuote
Share: