Hello!

I have a narrowband dataset taken with a DSLR and a L-Extreme filter. I usually integrate Ha & Oiii separately so I can then compose them back with StarTools.

I've done best 90%, 80% and 60% integrations for both emission lines. Then, cleared all loaded data from APP and re-loaded those integrations as light frames and ran "Normalize" so that they get analyzed.

What I found is that the best quality score depend on the emission line:

* For Ha: 90% best subs

* For Oiii: 60% best subs

I did this analysis because I want to get a good balance between SNR & FWHM and I think the quality score is a good relative measure of that.

So, here's my question: Would it make sense that I pick different % integrations based on the best quality scores of each emission line to get the best composite possible?

Thanks in advance,

Lucas