Calibration Flats, ...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !

Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Calibration Flats, not available -no Instrument name in FITS header

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1,564 Views
(@museceleste)
Red Giant
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 40
Topic starter  

When I calibrate my lights (all with gain 111) with darks, flats and darkflats (all of them with gain 111) the '2) Calibrate' process sometimes halts asking to select the correct masterflat for light frames. Version beta-24.

The dialog provides two items to chose from: one is the correct flat (at ISO/gain: 111.0), the other is a weird item: "MF-IG_0.0-E_0.0s-notAvailable-5496x3672.fits".

And searching through the astropixelprocessor directory I found other items like "BPM-notAvailable-5496x3672.fits" next to a proper BPM fits file.

Why is that?


This topic was modified 3 years ago 2 times by Mabula-Admin

   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5357
 

Dear Gilles @museceleste,

that notAvailable indicates that there are flats without an instrument tag in the FITS header. You can fix those frames with the Batch Modify FIts metadata tool 😉 find the problem files and then create new ones with the correct Instrument name, the instrument name is the name of the camera and that name is controlled by your capture software/hardware.

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@museceleste)
Red Giant
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 40
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin 

Thank you! Decidedly, APP has answers to almost every thing 😉
Didn't know about this batch tool. Now that I do, I have 3 more questions (sorry):

1. With regards to the APP dialog on the left hand side, I can't find the HDU1 'filter' nor the HDU1 'Session' tags in my flats (even in regular/normal flats created by my ASIxxx camera). Do these header tags exist? What should they contain? Does the tool massively replace only the non-blank (or filled) fields?

2. After opening/selecting several flats with the tool, is there a way to inspect their individual headers sequentially (e.g. by pressing a NEXT button?)

3. Is there a textbox into which I could enter a header tag content and let APP search for the corresponding file(s) that contain it? And would it support wildcards?

Tks

Gil



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5357
 

Hi Gilles @museceleste,

THe Batch Modify FIts tool is made for issue like this. Data created within 1 imaging session where the captured software or hardware did not have correct settings or was misconfigured by mistake.

So the frames that you load into tool should be from the same imaging session, then you will know that the header tags present or not will be the same, right?

The filter tag should be in the FITS HDU normally, most capture software will put that tag into the saved files. The session tag is not standard, APP will enter this in saved images that were loaded in multi-session mode with a session tag applied to those frames.

If you need to alter the instrument, enter a new name in the instrument field and the saved files will have that in the Fits HDU.

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
Share: