UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
I am rather confused about how APP ranks light frames in a batch. Here is an example sorted on quality score:
First half is 60 second frames. These are taken without filter.
Second half is 180 second frames. These are taken with a quad band filter. These have higher star count and much lower FWHM.
This is the best 60 second frame:
This is the best 180 second frame:
What I find strange is that APP ranks all 60 seconds frames superior to the 180 second frames. And I just can't understand why.
I don't understand all the values presented, so the answer is probably there somewhere, but to me it does not make sense right now looking at them.
HelgeÂ
