Light Pollution Too...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

MAY 4 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta44 has been released !

New improved internal memory controls should now work on all computers

May 1 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta43 has been released !

Improved internal memory controls (much more stable and faster on big datasets), fixed CPU image viewer, fixed Narrowband extraction demosaic algortihms.

Apr 29 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta42 has been released !

New improved Normalization engine, Fixed random crashes in integration, fixed RGB Combine & Calibrate Star Colors, fixed Narrowband extraction algorithms, new development platform with performance gains, bug fixes in the tools, etc...

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Light Pollution Tool

9 Posts
3 Users
1 Reactions
3,889 Views
(@rockinrod)
Neutron Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 130
Topic starter  

Trying to figure out the best way to use this Light Pollution tool...I usually put about 10-15 smaller squares in the worst part of the pollution. I hit save then do it again, but the light comes back or it jumps around the screen. I'll repeat this process over and over until I can remove no more.

Can you give me the proper procedure for using this tool...Right now I'm just guessing.

 

Thanks,

 

Rod



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Sure thing Rod;

The best way is to overstretch your image (select 30% stretch on the right). Over-saturate as well and then place 5 boxes all around on spots that to you look like proper background. Boxes don't need to be big. Then press calculate and have a look. Add 1 to 2 boxes each time towards the problem areas (not immediately on top of them) and press calculate again. Work your way up to the problem areas. The reason this works better is because the model APP uses is "rigid", true gradient's shouldn't go all over the place so that than helps the user to achieve a better result.



   
ReplyQuote
(@rockinrod)
Neutron Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 130
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod

Wow, you have all the answers...! I'll cut and paste this into my APP notes Vince.

Thanks again!

 

Rod



   
ReplyQuote
(@xthestreams)
Red Giant
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 43
 

WOW - i didn't know that either, I have been doing it all wrong! 



   
ReplyQuote
(@rockinrod)
Neutron Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 130
Topic starter  

@xthestreams

 

I seems to work a lot better. I think the intention of the software is to click on the darkest areas first, then that slowly pushes the LP over to the other side attempting to eliminate it. 

It won't get it all but it's a start...

I was clicking on the brightest parts thinking I was supposed to select what I was trying to get rid of.



   
ReplyQuote
(@xthestreams)
Red Giant
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 43
 

same! in our mutual defence the on screen instruction just ask for 5 boxes, it's not completely clear which boxes! 🙂 

 

Having said that I went back a redid an image im working on today using the "proper" technique and it's not that different to my eye, which I think says a lot about how robust APP's algorithm is (at least it does to me)



   
ReplyQuote
(@rockinrod)
Neutron Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 130
Topic starter  

@xthestreams

I was working on a Milky Way image near the beach where I live. Light pollution being the worse enemy. I've been playing with this thing for three days. 

I'll have to find a darker site next time.! I manipulated it so much to the point of destroying my back ground...Not good...

MW Done copy

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@xthestreams)
Red Giant
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 43
 

stunning shot! I can see why you're putting the time into it!



   
Rodney Bell reacted
ReplyQuote
(@rockinrod)
Neutron Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 130
Topic starter  

@xthestreams

I do mostly deep sky, but I've always wanted to try this!



   
ReplyQuote
Share: