Can you Help me?
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

MAY 4 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta44 has been released !

New improved internal memory controls should now work on all computers

May 1 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta43 has been released !

Improved internal memory controls (much more stable and faster on big datasets), fixed CPU image viewer, fixed Narrowband extraction demosaic algortihms.

Apr 29 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta42 has been released !

New improved Normalization engine, Fixed random crashes in integration, fixed RGB Combine & Calibrate Star Colors, fixed Narrowband extraction algorithms, new development platform with performance gains, bug fixes in the tools, etc...

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Can you Help me?

7 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
406 Views
(@mikehergertyahoo-com)
White Dwarf
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 7
Topic starter  

I am trying to process images in APP and can't get it to work with my SCT.  I have used APP in the past with my refractor images and everything seems to go smoothly.  For the last few nights, I have been taking photos with a 9.25 Celestron SCT and I keep getting very fuzzy stacked output.  The individual frames look OK, but when I stack them I get a very fuzzy looking image.  I'm sure I am doing something wrong, but I can't figure out what it is.  I've tried shortening exposure times and playing around with APP settings, but I still have the same problem.  The guiding seems decent.  I've run out of ideas.  Can you help me?  I've attached an individual sub and a typical stacked result. Thank you!

Light Pinwheel925 0310 60.0s jpg
Pinwheel925 0310 RGB session 1 St jpg


   
ReplyQuote
(@astrogee)
Black Hole
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 229
 

Whoa! That is very strange. If single images are ok, try stacking without calibration. First I do normalize, then throw out any image that is below .8 on image quality or star quality - You may have some really bad images that are getting into the stack. Then integrate. If it's all good then your calibration needs to be looked into.



   
ReplyQuote
(@mikehergertyahoo-com)
White Dwarf
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 7
Topic starter  

Thank you for your suggestion- I never would have thought of that one.  It didn't seem to make much difference, but I tried using smaller numbers of raw images.  The blurry stack I posted is 290 frames.  If I just stack 15 or so, the result is still blurry, but not as bad.  As I  add more data, it keeps getting worse.  Does that suggest anything? 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mikehergertyahoo-com)
White Dwarf
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 7
Topic starter  

For what it's worth, I think I got the issue sorted out.  I uninstalled APP and re-installed it with all the default settings.  That seemed to work, although I don't know exactly why.  It's strange that the older settings and version worked OK with other data sets, but not the recent SCT info.  I hope this continues to work.



   
ReplyQuote
(@tfergu01)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 36
 

Hi Michael,

That single sub looks good to me so I would not expect that result for the final image with the default settings. Can you show some screenshots of the settings in each of the steps? Or I believe you can somehow set the settings to default and maybe stack again to see if you get the same result.  

Tom



   
ReplyQuote
(@tfergu01)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 36
 

Hi Michael,

I see you got it figured out. Your post must have gone up while I was writing mine. 

Tom



   
ReplyQuote
(@mikehergertyahoo-com)
White Dwarf
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 7
Topic starter  

Thanks Tom-  you nailed it!



   
ReplyQuote
Share: