Amp glow not remove...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

2026-10-09 APP 2.0.0-beta48 has been released !

This is mainly a bug fix release for the reported bugs in beta47. In addition it has a significant User Interface performance improvement noticable when you need to process 1000s of images in APP.

2026-10-03 APP 2.0.0-beta47 has been released !

This is a very big release... many code optimizations/rewrites, many parts of APP are much faster and more precise, especially star analysis and registration are much faster ! Big mosaics will go much faster 🙂

And we introduce a new preview filter, which includes the new Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch and a General Levels Stretch, this has been long over due. The old preview filter (the panel on the right side to stretch and preview your data) has not been updated for a couple of years and it is a critical part of any APP session.

Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch or ADSS is a much more intuitive stretch algorithm. It is also color preserving (which is a great new addition in itself ! ) which means that the highlights are no longer bleached, color is maintained from the linear data while stretching. You can simply stretch your data using the sky background level and signal width sliders which work much easier and more intuitive. You no longer need to fiddle with the old complicated sliders with zoom buttons. All the zoom buttons for the sliders are made redundant. And you can enter slider values in the slider value fields yourself. I will make a youtube video in the coming days to explain and fully introduce ADSS. Once the video is ready, it will be highlighted on the forum.

RGB Combine upgrade !. The RGB Combine Tool has been rewritten mostly. The tool is faster and easier to use and most importantly, the Luminance slider to inject a luminance channel or channels into the RGB composite is now working correctly. It no longer bleaches the RGB colors. Combined with the new ADSS preview, you will get much better and easier great composites with great color! I will also explain this in a new youtube video.

Amp glow not removed

20 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
4,966 Views
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

Hello.
For some reason amp glow is not calibrated out of the final integration image.
My data set has Light, Dark, DarkFlat, Flat, Bias frames.
Camera: ASI 294MM Pro. All frames were shot at Temp=-20C, Gain=250.
I provided the link to download master files and final integration. Amp glow is on both sides of the image due to meridian flip. I also included integration created in DeepSkyStacker which also has amp glow.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1QMOQB7y4lVQTQQC_34r4BU9vLJVqJvBt?usp=sharing

Please help me find what the issue is. I'm happy to reshoot dark and bias frames again if necessary.

I chose cosmetic correction (hot pixel kappa=3, cold column kappa=8, hot column kappa=8), 32-bit masters, Scale MasterDark and Scale MasterFlat, Adaptive Pedestal=on. Let me know if additional files are needed.

software version 1.08.3 beta 2


This topic was modified 5 years ago by Maxim Senin

   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Hi Maxim, I'll have a look. Thanks for sharing the data!



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Adding to that, can you upload like 20 light subs at least? Just 1 won't work very well I think for calibration purposes.



   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod Hi, Vincent. Are you trying to reproduce it? I thought you can tell what's wrong just by looking at the FITS headers...
I uploaded all Ha-subs in a ZIP file. It's rather large at 1.7GB. Same link.
FYI all master files were created using "automatic" integration; cosmetic correction (hot pixel kappa=3, cold column kappa=8, hot column kappa=8), 32-bit masters, Scale MasterDark and Scale MasterFlat, Adaptive Pedestal=on.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Yes, I'm trying to recreate and see what's happening. 🙂 Thanks for uploading. Please allow for a day as it's rather busy at the moment, but hope to have an answer faster. And just for my clarification; you created the master files on automatic mode right? The other settings you post are what you did afterwards. Scaling means you didn't have darks for the exposure you used I guess then. That may be the problem as amp-glow is not behaving linear and scaling that doesn't work well.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

And apart from that, I don't see a MasterDark?



   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

My bad. Here you go.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Thanks, will have a closer look at it today.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Ok, had a look and I'm not seeing a big issue. I loaded in 15 of your first lights, added the master calibration files and loaded 1 light to check how the correction is working (top of APP window, switching the view from linear(l) to l-calibrated) and that showed this;

Linear, non calibrated view of a single sub:

AmpGlow

Calibrated view of a single sub:

Calibrated

And then the integration of all 15 lights:

Result


   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

What? How? Did you use different settings than me? Can you try stacking all subs? Maybe there are a few than throw off the averages... I'm getting

image
image
image

 for my Ha, O3, S2 stacks 🙁



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Try stacking the first 15, those I tried. I simply loaded those in, added the master bias, master dark and master flat, went to tab 6 and pressed integrate. 🙂 I'll try all the subs.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

All subs you send from just Ha:

result2

So must be a setting you changed I think. Or a workflow issue.



   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod And that was with "automatic" integration or "average" with local normalisation? Adaptive Pedestal on or off? "Align channels" and/or "Remove Light Pollution"? Normalisation: "regular with multi-scale and BWMV" and "neutralize background"? MBB and LNC? No under/overshoot?
I can try "automatic" since I don't have any satellites or meteors in the subs so may not need sigma clipping... But I thought it's just the ADU difference between MD and Light frames or MD, MB and Light frames.
I'll try smaller stacks too.



   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod Am I doing something stupid then? Do I need to uncheck all calibration frames and leave only masters checked because maybe it's over-correcting when both calibration frames and masters are checked?



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Completely automatic, standard settings, no LNC or MBB even. Sigma clipping is also done automatically, you never have to change that, unless you still see a trail for instance. Adaptive pedestal is also standard on, so no need to change anything.

So to recap;

0. Start APP (restart if already open to reset settings)

1. Load all H-alpha lights and master calibration files (use the master buttons)

2. Go to tab 6, press integrate



   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

Thanks. I could not work out what setting was causing this. When I have only light frames and Master calibration frames selected the integrated stack image comes out clean just like you had. My hunch is that I initially had both masters and individual calibration frames selected which caused over- or under-correction.



   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

I was able to reproduce it by checking "Scale MasterDark", "Scale MasterDarkFlat" and "align channels" and "split channels" boxes, having subs for all 3 filters selected along with corresponding master calibration frames.
Is this a bug or a feature?



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

That may be, why are you scaling the darks in those cases? As I mentioned, scaling a dark doesn't work for amp-glow as that doesn't behave properly in a way that APP could calculate what it would be. To make sure you prevent this, I would work on each filtered data separately and then use the final integrations (without calibration data) to combine.



   
ReplyQuote
(@maximastrophoto-com)
Neutron Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 72
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod I guess I misunderstood the tooltip on “scale MasterDarks” box - it seemed like scaling improves the matching. Thanks for the explanation.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

No, scaling is for the case that you have lights that have a different exposure time than the darks. When the dark has no amp glow, you can scale it to still work.

And, you're welcome!



   
ReplyQuote
Share: