UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hi everybody,
I have 151 light frames of C/2022 E3.
After processing it with correction frames of course, it seem to have 2 comets in the image. the one on the middle ist obvious but on the left side there appears a second one... Also we see different lenght in the startrails. These seem to correspond with the "second" comet.
Please give some help...
CS Peter
Â
There actually is a second comet in the same view at the moment. 🙂
Whow, ok, thank you, but why we have these different lenght in startrails?
@sternefueralle Looks like you imaged when the comet was close to C2022 U2 ATLAS, so a two for one. Little harder to process if their relative motion is different, so you likely need two separate comet registration integrations to add each of them to the final image maybe
@vincent-mod No, 30secs for all.
Interesting, maybe there was a rather big difference in quality between frames?
@vincent-mod I don't think so. It occured a meridian flip during the sequence. So there is a little timegap of 5 minutes when the flip happened.
Mm, maybe something happened there? Can you verify some frames after that are indeed 30 secs? The 5 min gap causes a pause in the star stripe so looking at the image the short stripes do line up with the longer one after that with similar brightness.
Hi Vincent, I worked on this strange behavior and now worked it out. Perhaps you'll find it interesting for you.
There was a time gap for meridian flip, around 5 Minutes.
Times: 19:04 - 20:16, 121 frames and 20:21 - 20:39, 30 frames. Each of them 30 secs, flats, darks, darkflat, all 30 secs.
I now stacked the frames with ASTAP and found, that there are two trails for the comet with this little gap. See first pic.
So it seems to me, that APP does not add the smaller part of the frames after the flip to the comet. So we see "two" comets, one ist the stacked one and the second, left of it, is all the rest after the flip. Not focused on. So we see "2" comets.
I answered all the questions in APP to mark the comet in the pictures, but allthough it was not stacked properly, on top of the first part of pics.
As you mentioned, there is a second comet in the same area. see pic 3. This we can see below the "main" comet at the bottom auf the pic, coming just into the pic. It is faint, but it is there.
Â
Thank you...
