UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
I would like to see the ability for APP to auto weight sessions in the combine RGB tool.
I have some data that will at times have multiple exposure times in it. For instance a bunch of 600s SHO, a bunch of 300s SHO, and then a bunch of 120s LRGB.
If there was a way when you added them all into the combine RGB tool, perhaps by clicking a check box within it, to have the system auto weight those exposures that would be awesome. My thought would be to have the 120s set at a weight of 11.8% then the 300s at a weight of 29.4% and then the 600s at a weight of 58.8% that would allow an automatic combination of exposures that would take into account the exposure length and in my opinion give a smoother result.
I would like the check box to do this so people could have it do things the standard way to account for things such as sky brightness or exposures with different illumination or different optics and cameras. I think it would definitely add value and make things easier in some circumstances, especially with using LRGB for stars with narrowband data for a nebula.
