UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Â
Interesting artifact is best seen when sequencing through darks. There are two types of hot pixels, those that are constantly turned on and those that come and go over time. I tried lowering the kappa used for BPM to no avail. The solution was to check the box for "cosmetic correction of hot pixels" using the default kappa value.
Just wondering if my solution is recommended or if there is something better?
APP 1.075
Â
And you are using sigma clipping? If it's randomized between subs that should already work. Otherwise if your solution works... great! 🙂
Sigma clipping on the darks? No because I only have 25 darks. Somewhere in the video tutorials I was advised to use sigma clipping only if I have 100 or more. For that reason I use sigma clipping on bias only.
Â
Ah ok, sorry, I missed this to be in the darks. No then your solution is indeed the correct one.
