vertical gradients
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

15th Feb 2024: Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta29 released - macOS native File Chooser, macOS CMD-Q fixed, read-only Fits on network fixed and other bug fixes

7th December 2023:  added payment option Alipay to purchase Astro Pixel Processor from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and other countries where Alipay is used.

 

vertical gradients

7 Posts
3 Users
1 Likes
570 Views
(@pswilson1)
Red Giant
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 30
Topic starter  
California raw stack

Does anyone have an opinion about where the vertical light bands on the left and right edges are coming from?  This required so much cropping that I wasn't able to get it all and keep the large nebula intact. This image was the result of 310, 60 second subs using a RASA 8 at F/2, an Optolong L-extreme filter, and a ASI533 OSC camera, unity gain.  Dithering at every 2nd frame, 10 pixels.  Flats, dark flats, and darks duly acquired and applied.  There was a meridian flip as well.

Happy for any criticism or suggestions which could enable me to get a better result next time.  Artifacts like this have been occurring repeatedly, and I don't know what is causing this problem.


   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 2133
 

@pswilson1

Hi Paul,

Those edges are caused by the fact that the subs do not exactly overlap because of dithering. You see the regions where there was less signal accumulated because less frames cover those areas. You can blend those edges better by enabling MBB in tab 6. The black edges will not disappear and the only way to get rid of them is to crop.

 

Wouter


   
ReplyQuote
(@pswilson1)
Red Giant
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 30
Topic starter  

@wvreeven  Thanks.  But I DID enable MBB and I always do.  This remains a serious problem.  

I am between a rock and a hard place.  If I don't dither heavily, I get pattern noise.  

This post was modified 3 years ago by Paul Wilson

   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 2133
 

@pswilson1 What value did you set MBB to? The default 5%? If yes, try a higher value like 10 or even 15% and see if that helps.

Dithering really is useful, even if that means having to sacrifice some of the FOV. The California Nebula seems to be a pretty large object for your telescope and camera anyway and I understand that it is hard to crop that beautiful image!


   
ReplyQuote
(@pswilson1)
Red Giant
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 30
Topic starter  

@wvreeven

Yes, default.  Thank you, I will definitely try setting this MBB value higher as this problem has recurred several times.


   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Dear Paul @pswilson1,

I see that the difference in Field of View for your light frames changes a bit. Now in combination with the strong signal of the nebulosity I would suggest you to try:

5) Normalize, use advanced normalization

I think that should fix it 😉

If not entirely okay yet, enable LNC first degree with a couple of iterations. That should really fix it in combination with MBB 10% roughly.

Please let us know if this helps 😉

Mabula


   
ReplyQuote
(@pswilson1)
Red Giant
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 30
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin

corrected cal nebula

 Wow!  Those suggestions made a HUGE improvement.  I am embarrassed to say that I didn't even realize that normalization could be bumped up to "advanced".  Plus I did run the LNC 1st degree at 2 iterations.  Thank you so much for these instructions.  I have learned something.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Share: