Problem: HaO3 separ...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

UPDATE FROM MABULA

I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.

 

Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.

 

APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46.  Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.

Problem: HaO3 separation

9 Posts
2 Users
2 Reactions
2,696 Views
(@rkmvca)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter  

Hi, I'm having an issue processing an image taken with the Optolong L-extreme filter -- it looks like the Ha and O3 layers are not exactly aligned.

First off, when I process the data as "HaO3 color", it looks pretty good, everything is aligned:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/6mogr7Pji8vz75jB8

However, when I process the data as "HaO3 extract Ha", then "HaO3 extract O3" it's not.

First, the Ha data after integration  https://photos.app.goo.gl/7Xi1WPbqU2MMkDej7

You can see a sliver of black at the top left, running along and then tapering off to nothing about half way across the image.

Looking at the O3 integration, the sliver of black is at the bottom left margin, again tapering off to about nothing halfway across the image.   https://photos.app.goo.gl/vdVuBnQLXrwk7o6H6

Combining these 2 with color weighting shows the result that red and green are misaligned at the left side of the picture, but fairly well aligned at the right:   https://photos.app.goo.gl/NMdJN2C6S94PHe5U6

This is weird! Particularly because I've done this before, and not seen the same thing, for example in this false color image of the Pacman Nebula:  https://photos.app.goo.gl/JLVddJC4Qjm9DsDSA

Can someone help me debug this issue?



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

@rkmvca Hi Rich,

Which version of APP do you use and on which OS are you?

Meanwhile, you can take the Ha and OIII integration results and load them as lights (no calibration data). Then go to tab 5 and click the normalize button. This will execute the intermediate steps, including registration. When done, save the normlized files in tab 5 and combine those.

HTH, Wouter



   
ReplyQuote
(@rkmvca)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter  

I am on version 1.083, windows 10 64 bit .  I'll try your 'meanwhile' suggestions and get back to you tomorrow.

Thanks!

- Rich



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

@rkmvca Hi Rich,

Can you make sure to use version 1.083.4? The other, older, 1.083 versions have bugs that may explain the symptoms you see.

Wouter



   
ReplyQuote
(@rkmvca)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter  

Hi Wouter,

Should I just go ahead and use 2.0.0-beta 9?  I have it downloaded but not installed. 

- Rich



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

@rkmvca Hi Rich,

If you would mind and answer my question about which version you currently are using, then I can advise you better. If you are not using 1.083.4 then 1.083.4 should be good. However, 2.0.0-beta9 should be better but bear in mind that that's a beta version and may contain bugs.

Wouter



   
ReplyQuote
(@rkmvca)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter  

Oh, sorry about that, I thought I mentioned it.  I'm on 1.083.  I'll try 1.083.4 then. 

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

@rkmvca You did mention 1.083 but it was unclear to me if that was a generic indication of any 1.083 version or 1.083(.0) specifically 🙂  Anyway, yes please try 1.083.4 and let us know here if that solves your issue. 



   
ReplyQuote
(@rkmvca)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 23
Topic starter  

Hi Wouter - 

Following the steps outlined in your first response at 0:08 using 1.083.4, things worked and I got a decent image! 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/jX8hqKhe3vE9L2u77

Thanks much,

- Rich

 

 


This post was modified 4 years ago by Rich Klein

   
ReplyQuote
Share: