UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hi friends!
I'm working on a big integration (~750 subs / ~100 hrs). When I do my integration (HA-Oiii extract HA), the final image that gets produced is just a blank image. It shows up blank/black in APP, and pure white (but I can see dithering artifacts) in Pixinsight.
I'm on V2 beta 6 on an M1 Mac. (I also tried on my PC, 2.0 Beta 2, and it gave me the same result.)
I fiddled around trying to disable various settings that I normally use, and I think I nailed it down to LNC.
I normally do 4th Degree LNC, 3 iterations, and it usually works great. Now these settings are producing the pure white integrated image. When I change that to 2nd Degree LNC / 3 iterations, it produces a normal mono HA image like I expect.
I'm now testing different levels/iterations of LNC, but I'd love to know what caused the blank integration file at 4th degree 3 iterations of LNC.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Jeff
A lot of the times LNC is not needed, why do you go to more degrees than standard? Does the standard 1st degree and 3 iterations produce a good result? It may be that you're adding too much complexity for the algorithm with specifically this data. Just a speculation at the moment though. 🙂
@vincent-mod I could never tell that LNC was making a difference unless I used 4th degree 3 iterations, so that's what I usually use. I ended up going with 2nd degree 3 iterations for this one, and it looked great.
