Wrong normalization...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Wrong normalization on calibrated frames 1.077

5 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,920 Views
(@fendium)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 15
Topic starter  

I am exeperiencing a strange bug in APP 1.077 when applying neutralizeBG in calibrated images

Everyting seems ok until, after calibration, i check visually the calibrated with neutralizeBG: instead of "equalizing" the RGB curves, the blue one becomes dominant in the hystogram, the sky background becomes blu, object on the image becomes yellow.

If i use the same masters (calculated with 1.077) and follow the same procedure on same lights with older 1.075, the problem disappear, and the overall nbg seems much better.

I check on three different pc (intel notebook and AMD+radeon GPU) and all GL settings, but with same result. The effect is present also in the saved tiff / jpeg.

Am i doing someting wrong in my procedure? There is something "wrong" in my raw files?

 

Here an example with two images, same target of two different night, same equipment and exposure time.

M86-1-60-3-C0.fit = GOOD FRAME with 1.077

1.077 GOODFRAME cal nbg

 

M86-1-60-1-C0.fit = BAD FRAME with 1.077

1.077 BADFRAME cal nbg

 

M86-1-60-3-C0.fit = GOOD FRAME with 1.075

1.075 GOODFRAME cal nbg

 

M86-1-60-1-C0.fit = BAD FRAME with 1.075

1.075 BADFRAME cal nbg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

There were some changes made in the models between these versions yes. Just to get this straight, are you using a gain of 3 for capturing data?



   
ReplyQuote
(@fendium)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 15
Topic starter  

Yes!

QHY10 / Gain = 3 / Offset = 129

Same settings for both images


This post was modified 6 years ago by Paolo Manicardi

   
ReplyQuote
(@fendium)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 15
Topic starter  

So there is sometingh wrong in using gain=3?

I select this value following the manufacturer procedure to set gain and offset to maximise the dynamic range of the camera.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

I don't think so no, I was simply not used to these numbers as I always read about people using gains in the 100+ but that's something which differs for some sensors apparently.

Do you still have the same issues with 1.078?



   
ReplyQuote
Share: