Weird artefact with...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

2026-10-09 APP 2.0.0-beta48 has been released !

This is mainly a bug fix release for the reported bugs in beta47. In addition it has a significant User Interface performance improvement noticable when you need to process 1000s of images in APP.

2026-10-03 APP 2.0.0-beta47 has been released !

This is a very big release... many code optimizations/rewrites, many parts of APP are much faster and more precise, especially star analysis and registration are much faster ! Big mosaics will go much faster 🙂

And we introduce a new preview filter, which includes the new Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch and a General Levels Stretch, this has been long over due. The old preview filter (the panel on the right side to stretch and preview your data) has not been updated for a couple of years and it is a critical part of any APP session.

Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch or ADSS is a much more intuitive stretch algorithm. It is also color preserving (which is a great new addition in itself ! ) which means that the highlights are no longer bleached, color is maintained from the linear data while stretching. You can simply stretch your data using the sky background level and signal width sliders which work much easier and more intuitive. You no longer need to fiddle with the old complicated sliders with zoom buttons. All the zoom buttons for the sliders are made redundant. And you can enter slider values in the slider value fields yourself. I will make a youtube video in the coming days to explain and fully introduce ADSS. Once the video is ready, it will be highlighted on the forum.

RGB Combine upgrade !. The RGB Combine Tool has been rewritten mostly. The tool is faster and easier to use and most importantly, the Luminance slider to inject a luminance channel or channels into the RGB composite is now working correctly. It no longer bleaches the RGB colors. Combined with the new ADSS preview, you will get much better and easier great composites with great color! I will also explain this in a new youtube video.

Weird artefact with a dslr and 50mm lens

10 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
5,505 Views
(@jan-willem)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 111
Topic starter  

Hi All,

 

I could use some assistance with a artefact i get after stacking.

I use a dslr (nikon d5100 modified) with a uv/ir cut filter on the front of the lens.

The lens is a Nikkor 50mm manual focus.

When i stack my lights i get circle artefacts i can't get rid of. I use Flats, Bias, Darks.

Can Anyone help me or explain how this artefacts happen?

 

Cheers Jan-Willem

Nikkor 50mm lens ic1805


   
ReplyQuote
Topic Tags
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Oeh now that is interesting. Looks like some kind of interference pattern. Could you upload a single sub with a good stretch to bring out the background? And the flats didn't work well as you can still see quite a few dust spots.



   
ReplyQuote
(@jan-willem)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 111
Topic starter  

Hi Vincent,

 

I've uploaded 4 files, a single shot lps corrected, a single shot only transformd from nef to jpeg, a master flat and a stack of the whole session.

You can clearly see that the MF does't work good (dust spots visible), i did also create a stack without any flat at all (to rule out the "bad flats") but the aretfacts are still visible in the stack.

What can i do to remove the cirlce pattern? Or is my lens defect?

 

Hope you can help me.

 

Cheers Jan-Willem

 

St avg 12098.0s NR x 1.0 LZ3 NS full qua add sc BWMV nor AAD RL MBB5 lpc cbg St
single file jpeg


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Well it's difficult to say, but I clearly see the pattern in your single sub as well, so it's in the data itself. Indeed when the flats don't seem to work, it's better to leave them out as they can introduce problems of their own. I've never seen it to be honest, do you have a photo of your setup as you used it? And what filter is it exactly (make)?

Maybe if you look closely at the filter and lens, do you see smudges or a particular "line" on it, maybe a scratch pattern? Interference patterns can be caused by obstructions in the light path and the behaviour of light itself around them. It might even be caused by parts in the camera, before the sensor.

edit: By looking around a bit, they may very well be Newton rings. They can be caused by glass transitions and such, so maybe try a photo without the UV filter next time.



   
ReplyQuote
(@jan-willem)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 111
Topic starter  

Hi,

 

Thanx for you're reply, it is a simple setup, just a dslr (modified) witf a standard nikkor 50mm lens.

The uv-ir filter is a standard filter, it is the same as used by ZWO.

Looking closely to the lens i can see that the lens is almost 0,5 inch (1 cm) deep in the body. From the outher thread till the lens there is a spiral pattern in the lens body. If i would place the uv-ir filter in front of the lens (like i did) would it be possible that the spiral stucture we see would be a reflection of the spiral sturcture in the lens body reflecting in the uv filter?

 

There arn't any spiral or scratch visible, also when i take a picture during daytime there arn't any pattern visible.

 

Cheers Jan-Willem

20190404 200512
20190404 200506
20190404 200355


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

You probably don't see it in daytime photography, because, as you can see from that single sub, the signal is very low and completely disappears with a much brighter picture. These things haunt you when doing astrophotography and having to deal with faint signals and noise. I'm suspecting the filter actually, it could be it just happens to cause Newton rings. Worth a try, you might even be able to test it also on cloudy nights, just taking subs of clouds basically. 🙂



   
ReplyQuote
(@jan-willem)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 111
Topic starter  

Hi, thanx.

I've got also a bit better filter i will try what happens with and without the filter.

 

Cheers Jan-Willem



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

ps. you also mention it is modified, who did the modification and what was done?



   
ReplyQuote
(@jan-willem)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 111
Topic starter  

I did it by my self. Only the ir and Moire filters removed.

With my Newton and refractor I've never encounterd any Newtonian ringing pattern. So it must be the new lens.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Ok that's good to know. I hope it sheds some light ( 😉 ) on it!



   
ReplyQuote
Share: