15th Feb 2024: Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta29 released - macOS native File Chooser, macOS CMD-Q fixed, read-only Fits on network fixed and other bug fixes
7th December 2023: added payment option Alipay to purchase Astro Pixel Processor from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and other countries where Alipay is used.
I'm doing nothing different as I was doing before 4 months ago, where everything worked...
I created all master calibration frames with 1.082 or 1.083beta1. Then I press calibrate, then normalize and checked every frame. Then Integrate. All default settings.
But the strange thing is that all single session comes out perfect.
If you are so kind to check my files, I can upload to you some frames.
Thanks
Edit: I rerun everything with exact the same settings and files, and now is ok...
mmmhhhh. so strange and weird...
Could you please have a quick look at my files? Because it will happen for sure in the future...
Your data in terms of sky background and dispersion values shows a very weird pattern... I can not really understand it. There might be an issue here with the capture software or the camera somehow or maybe a filter was changed all of a sudden leading to this odd pattern.
If I make an analytical graph of your sky background values, it is shown clearly that on frame 12, where the 2nd session begins, it is much less dark which time can explain, but then later on at frame 21, it is much less dark allthough the according to the time when the exposure was shot it should be darker..
Any ideas about what happened in the 2nd session with your gear and exposures?
If you do encounter the issue that you had, please try to find step by step the way so it fails each time and produces the error. Then i would be able to solve it/explain it for sure 😉
Your data in terms of sky background and dispersion values shows a very weird pattern... I can not really understand it. There might be an issue here with the capture software or the camera somehow or maybe a filter was changed all of a sudden leading to this odd pattern.
If I make an analytical graph of your sky background values, it is shown clearly that on frame 12, where the 2nd session begins, it is much less dark which time can explain, but then later on at frame 21, it is much less dark allthough the according to the time when the exposure was shot it should be darker..
Any ideas about what happened in the 2nd session with your gear and exposures?
Mabula
Yes, I noticed this weird thing too...
Nothing particular happened. I think that moon makes the difference in the 1 session.
The fact that the target went down near the horizon where there is all lighr pollution from my city bortle 8 sky, for me is the other clue to interpret the strange pattern of the 2nd session...
Your data in terms of sky background and dispersion values shows a very weird pattern... I can not really understand it. There might be an issue here with the capture software or the camera somehow or maybe a filter was changed all of a sudden leading to this odd pattern.
If I make an analytical graph of your sky background values, it is shown clearly that on frame 12, where the 2nd session begins, it is much less dark which time can explain, but then later on at frame 21, it is much less dark allthough the according to the time when the exposure was shot it should be darker..
Any ideas about what happened in the 2nd session with your gear and exposures?
Mabula
Yes, I noticed this weird thing too...
Nothing particular happened. I think that moon makes the difference in the 1 session.
The fact that the target went down near the horizon where there is all lighr pollution from my city bortle 8 sky, for me is the other clue to interpret the strange pattern of the 2nd session...
