Lunar / Planet proc...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Lunar / Planet processing in APP ??

19 Posts
11 Users
6 Reactions
8,652 Views
(@tomzdk)
White Dwarf
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 9
Topic starter  

Is it possible to process/stack multiple Lunar exposures - and process this in APP ?

- If Yes: Have tried -  but the "Star Analysis" failed (make sense when no stars is present). How to setup the workflow ??

- If No: Thanks for reply and comments  😀

Kind Regards.

Thomas 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5260
 

Hi Thomas @tomzdk,

No not yet, because registration/alignment of images is only possible right now on images with stars... I intend to include this possibility in the future though by finding registration points in lunar/solar/planetary images as well so they can be processed.

So, the possibility will come at some point in time.

Cheers,

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
(@tomzdk)
White Dwarf
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 9
Topic starter  

Dear Mabula.

Thank you for a fast reply.

Now - i dont need to crack my head, in search of this option i APP.  👍 Guess you have lots of request for new add-ons in APP - but sure we´re some who´s looking forward to Lunar/solar/Planetary processing possibility also.

Kind regards.

Thomas 



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5260
 

Hi Thomas @tomzdk,

You're most welcome, yes, some others users requested this as well, so it's definitely on my radar 😉

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
 Chas
(@chasdso)
White Dwarf
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 10
 

+1 for moon and planetary



   
ReplyQuote
(@martneil)
Hydrogen Atom
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 1
 

Hi Mabula,

Please add one more request for the addition of planetary processing.  If, when it comes, it's as good/simple as APP is at the moment it will be fantastic.  I'm constantly amazed how simple and quick it is but yet returns an excellent image.  Simply brilliant

Cheers

Neil


This post was modified 8 years ago by martneil

   
ReplyQuote
(@eckhardv)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 10
 

Dear Mabula,

+1 for moon image processing!  



   
ReplyQuote
(@pekdar)
Red Giant
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 39
 

@mabula-admin

+ 1 for moon, planetary and sun

Maybe, you could find some examples with functionality from Siril application. To bring user requests more in front of your road map 😉



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

😉 Well, he knows very well what the top requests are at the moment. Planetary is requested yes, but will require a whole different approach as all of APP is focused (no pun intended) on stars. So, it might be a future feature but will be quite a bit away. Top requests at the moment are deconvolution, denoise, HDR and comet stacking.



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

And the ability to save and load the APP configuration which I think still is the top request.



   
pekdar reacted
ReplyQuote
(@pekdar)
Red Giant
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 39
 

@wvreeven

exactly, I really miss the possibility of creating a project with a dedicated configuration settings option and saving them.



   
ReplyQuote
 Ross
(@chifles)
Brown Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 6
 

It is possible to stack multiple lunar images in APP! 

 

Quite likely there are better ways than this and if so someone can add a better workflow while we wait for the Manual to arrive or a solar system update patch. I have tried this method twice on two different phases of the moon with some success. 

 

In this instance, I took 200 fits frames of the moon (and flats and biases) taken with my refractor and 533mc camera using the ASIAIR at lowest gain and its fastest speed, all while waiting for the moon to drop and DSO imaging to start. Perhaps because I had not adjusted the image depth to 8 bits I could not find a way to use my existing PIPP or Autostakkert (I also had taken a video file but for some reason it was much more zoomed in) so I tried my APP.  Since there are no stars in the frames I used the comet/one star setting.  I did not have any success with star analysis turned off so I left it on and selected triangles rather than quadrilaterals (do not know if this latter change had a benefit).  When the option to target the comet came up I just selected a distinct crater. After identifying the cometary crater on the first frame, I then found I had to skip at least one of my frames for unknown reasons and then sequentially and tediously identify the comet on about 70% of the 200 frames with it just skipping over a few.  Apart from that I only had to alter the stretch parameters at minimum stretch to stop my stretched image being too bright

Edit: In case APP versions make a difference I note that I am using APP 2.0.0.beta 13 at this point.

moon April 27 TSA102 533mc Luminance session 1 lpc cbg St

 


This post was modified 3 years ago by Ross

   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5260
 

Hi @chifles,

Thank you very much for sharing this. I ahev never tried this myself and I am a bit surprised you were able to pull this of with the comet/one-star registration option.

I am working on the comet registration at the moment and I have solved several bugs relating to processing with star analysis disabled. So I would think that it will even better with star analysis disabled with the next release 2.0.0-beta18 😉

At some point we need to write special registration methods for planets/lunar and solar of course.

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
(@mchacur)
Hydrogen Atom
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 1
 

Posted by: @chifles

It is possible to stack multiple lunar images in APP! 

 

Quite likely there are better ways than this and if so someone can add a better workflow while we wait for the Manual to arrive or a solar system update patch. I have tried this method twice on two different phases of the moon with some success. 

 

In this instance, I took 200 fits frames of the moon (and flats and biases) taken with my refractor and 533mc camera using the ASIAIR at lowest gain and its fastest speed, all while waiting for the moon to drop and DSO imaging to start. Perhaps because I had not adjusted the image depth to 8 bits I could not find a way to use my existing PIPP or Autostakkert (I also had taken a video file but for some reason it was much more zoomed in) so I tried my APP.  Since there are no stars in the frames I used the comet/one star setting.  I did not have any success with star analysis turned off so I left it on and selected triangles rather than quadrilaterals (do not know if this latter change had a benefit).  When the option to target the comet came up I just selected a distinct crater. After identifying the cometary crater on the first frame, I then found I had to skip at least one of my frames for unknown reasons and then sequentially and tediously identify the comet on about 70% of the 200 frames with it just skipping over a few.  Apart from that I only had to alter the stretch parameters at minimum stretch to stop my stretched image being too bright

Edit: In case APP versions make a difference I note that I am using APP 2.0.0.beta 13 at this point.

-- attachment is not available --

 

I did exactly as you described and it worked great!! Thanks!!

 



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5260
 

@mchacur that is awesome ! Great 🙂



   
ReplyQuote
(@dameert)
Molecular Cloud
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2
 

Hi I am completely new to astrophotography. This post helped me a lot for me to process Jupiter (taking pictures with a compact camera).

APP seemed to be blocking completely on the registration process. I restarted the program an disabled the "star analysis" after which I could see APP processing my light frames and occasionally asking me to click on the "comet nucleus" which for me meant to click on jupiter.

And it worked! see my result using only a 10cm tripod without tracking using a compact camera TZ-70.

Jupiter RGB session 1

 



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
 Ross
(@chifles)
Brown Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 6
 

It is always exciting to get an image of another planet. Glad my moon technique worked for you, but that is really stretching the technique to try it for a somewhat over-exposed Jupiter captured with an untracked mount!

We all start somewhere though and if you are keen and want to get more into planetary or lunar photography (and spend more money) go over to Cloudynights website Major & Minor Planetary Imaging - Cloudy Nights and read the FAQ at the top of the planetary forum. You can also go to the forum sections on Lunar or beginning imaging (for nebula etc).

Generally speaking the moon is the best target for a compact camera, a DSLR or mirrorless camera can be used for star images as well as the moon. For planets, while results are possible with a DSLR or Mirrorless (in particular those that have suitable video modes) you want a specialist camera (covered in the FAQ) that does video imaging, this can also be used for the moon. Of course a tracking mount is best, but even an untracked mounted like a tripod if stable and if a great deal of patience and effort is applied to catch many frames in a video of the moon or planet as it drifts across the field of view can produce nice results.

Free software , PIPP, AS!3 or AS!4, Registax 6 or its newer replacement can be used to convert the video into a detailed image that is much better than any single frame.



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@dameert)
Molecular Cloud
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2
 

@chifles thank you! I will certainly dive into that information.



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5260
 

Posted by: @dameert

Hi I am completely new to astrophotography. This post helped me a lot for me to process Jupiter (taking pictures with a compact camera).

APP seemed to be blocking completely on the registration process. I restarted the program an disabled the "star analysis" after which I could see APP processing my light frames and occasionally asking me to click on the "comet nucleus" which for me meant to click on jupiter.

And it worked! see my result using only a 10cm tripod without tracking using a compact camera TZ-70.

Jupiter RGB session 1

 

Hi David @dameert,

Thank you very much for sharing your experience and result 😉 APP has not been designed to process lunar/solar/planetay images (yet), it is designed for deepsky and comet images. But it is nice to see that the comet alignment does work as well on planetary images.

Mabula

 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: