UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Yesterday I ended up with disappointing results in an Orion photo processing.
There was 1 oddity that I wanted to check into to see if the reason for the disappointing results has to do with the images not being combined together.
The oddity was that the frame edge didn't have any kind of discernable rounding due to the natural earth movement applied to the star field.
I stacked 38 light frames. Â Each frame was exposed for 1 minute, and there was 3 seconds of pause between shots.
Should I be seeing rounding on the integrated image within 40 minutes of exposure time?
Maybe I shouldn't but I just want to rule this out.
Do you have an example you can upload here? If it's stacked and you preview it in the preview window, a stretch should be applied showing you a lot more signal compared to a single frame. 1 min is a quite low exposure time though, but it still should show this effect.
Thank you Vincent: Â What kind of example would you be looking for? Â A jpeg of the completed project or a FITS after integration?
You can post a jpeg of the final integration here, just to get a better idea of what you mean.Thanks!
Vincent,
Here is the photo processed through.
I was hoping for better nebulosity and the result was somewhat underwhelming. Â As mentioned above the reason I was wondering if this even stacked properly is that I didn't notice any rounding on the corners on the uncropped photo.
That looks fine to me, it's definitely stacked otherwise you would likely not see the surrounding nebulosity and a single sub is probably way darker isn't it? Getting more out of the nebulosity requires way more data, longer exposures per frame and ofcourse things like narrow band filters will help you a lot as well. But you will have to get towards 5 min and longer regarding exposure time.
