UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
I need some help. attached are screen shots of my master flat and a sample Flat both with and w/o background neutralized. needless to say my final image is trash. Camera is an Nikon D850, 8"RC all shots captured in Nikopn RAW. Did a fresh install and ran 2.0.0 beta 3 with all defaults as set. i've been using this camera and APP for over a year and i have never seen this. Especially curious why my flat looks green and it is grey scale when i look at it in Photoshop
I went back and only ran the Calibration step. something is wrong and i am suspecting it is my flat files. here is a screen capture from the console as it processed on of my Flat files. i never remember seeing dispersion values of all zeroes. it is the same for all my flats
@jaximages Hi John,
Yeah, that dispersion indeed doesn't look good. What darks/bias/darkflats did you use? All also captured in Nikon RAW?
The master flat is grey in Photoshop since it hasn't been debayered.
Thanks, Wouter
In addition to what Wouter said, could you also show a screenshot of an unstretched result, you can do so by selecting "no stretch" on the right (where it now says "15% BG". This will show the actual signal unstretched.
A very good suggestion of Vincent. If the unstretched master flat is (almost) black then you are severely underexposing your flats.
an update. i went back and looked over my master calibration files. a couple of strange things.APP created 2 master flats. one with a portrait orientation and anoint er with a landscape orientation. my lights were a mix of portrait and landscape and my flats were all portrait. the landscape Master flat was trash, the other was ok. and yes my individual flats were under exposed. i loaded only a few frames of my lights and flats and re-ran only the calibration data and got this master flat.
I then reloaded all my lights, bias and dark frames. then ran integration. got the same crummy result. i then deleted the newest master flat and used the one pictured here from the sample run i did earlier. and got acceptable results.
Not sure what else i might have done wrong the first time except for over exposing my flats. From now on i will make sure the the "Auto Rotate" feature in my camera is turned off. The only thing that am puzzled about is why did APP create a MF with both portrait and landscape orientation?
I guess because this was saved as such, so APP has to assume nothing about the orientation as it can't tell.




