Grading Individual ...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Grading Individual Subs

6 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
1,948 Views
(@jeffmorgan)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 53
Topic starter  

Currently after an imaging run I process the subs through Analyze Stars (Tab 3) and evaluate subs based on star roundness. Anything under .60 gets deleted. When I feel enough integration time has been reached, I process everything with no further screening of subs.

 

I am wondering about the correctness of this. Is there a function like PI’s SubFrameSelector? What other tools, methods, and guidelines are APP users employing?



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Usually you won't really need to delete data based on that, if you have enough. APP will apply a quality rating to each sub and will use the worse frames less for the end-result, but it may still help quite a bit to increase overall signal.



   
ReplyQuote
(@hubert-hautecler)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 30
 

Hi Vincent, does this mean that very bad subs will be skipped by APP? So, I don't have to worry about bad subs?



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

They won't be skipped no, but they will have less of an impact. If you have subs with clouds or something, those I would take out manually. They can be skipped if you select to stack the "top-90%" or whatever percentage you want in the integrate tab.



   
ReplyQuote
(@hubert-hautecler)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 30
 

Vincent, thanks for the reply.



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5342
 

Posted by: @jeffmorgan

Currently after an imaging run I process the subs through Analyze Stars (Tab 3) and evaluate subs based on star roundness. Anything under .60 gets deleted. When I feel enough integration time has been reached, I process everything with no further screening of subs.

 

I am wondering about the correctness of this. Is there a function like PI’s SubFrameSelector? What other tools, methods, and guidelines are APP users employing?

Hi Jeff @jeffmorgan,

Please try APP 2.0.0-beta17 from our downloads page if you have not tried it yet. It shows you analytical graphs will processing, you can sort the data by clicking on the column headers and then if you plot the data on for isntance the star shape then you can easily remove frames with bad stars :-), you can make different plots with the right mouse button click menu on the frame list.

Mabula

 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: