Error calibrating u...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

15th Feb 2024: Astro Pixel Processor 2.0.0-beta29 released - macOS native File Chooser, macOS CMD-Q fixed, read-only Fits on network fixed and other bug fixes

7th December 2023:  added payment option Alipay to purchase Astro Pixel Processor from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and other countries where Alipay is used.

 

Error calibrating using flats

7 Posts
2 Users
0 Likes
2,816 Views
 Phil
(@philsav8)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter  

Hi Mabula,

I have a sequence of lights, darks, flats, bias frames taken with an ASI 294 colour camera and load them into APP.

I go though the calibration steps in Step 2 to create master flats, darks bias frames. 

I then check to see how an individual light frame will be processed and the result is unexpected. It looks to me that the flat does not have the correct exposure, however in the capture programme, I captured till the histogram was just in the middle? Is the problem the flat is not exposed correctly?

Thanks

Calibrated light

calibrated light

result of integration

Integration result

master flat

master flat

uncalibrated light

Uncalibrated light

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Hi Phil @philsav8,

In which APP version was this? in APP 1.061?

Did you create the master frames in APP 1.061?

Perhaps you can share your master frames so we can have a look why it's not working as expected?

Kind regards,

Mabula

 


   
ReplyQuote
 Phil
(@philsav8)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter  

Hi Mabula,

I redid the processing but this time with 10 lights, darks, flats, bias frames and still the same issue with the flats. I think I could be missing a step/setting?. I basically run through the tabs 0-6

This was done in APP 1.061.

I have uploaded the master flat/dar/bias frames plus some lights to Google Drive: 

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1o6KTpieYqcr35DhfcIKWdUeytsKCLWEp?usp=sharing

thanks Phil


   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Hi Phil @philsav8,

Thank you for sharing your data.

I have downloaded the data and I think I know what the source problem is. But... it's best if you can provide more information on your data:

In your initial post, you state that the data is from a ASI 294 colour camera.

So I would expect your light frames to be FITS frames in 16bits. They are 8bits TIFFs now and even compressed with LZW, that really will not be a good starting point.

https://astronomy-imaging-camera.com/product/asi294mc-color

The camera has a14bit ADC, so by storing at only 8bits (and compressed) a lot of information is lost. You should try to save the captured data in 16bits and uncompressed, preferably in FITS. (but TIFF should work as well)

Do you have original FITS frames? Or can you share how you captured your data, what capture software did you use?

Were the masters created from 8bits TIFFs as well? (it does seem so, because the masters are 8bit as well).

In the meantime, I will have a look at what I can get out of the data that you provided 😉

Mabula

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

@philsav8,

This is a screenshot of the masterdark with it's histogram.

MD ISO gain 0.0 exp 0.0s 10subs notAvailable NR avg St
MasterDark histogram
Masterdark screenshot

Both the Masterdark and MasterBias masters are very important for flat calibration to work well. Without a good Masterbias or Masterdark or both, flat calibration is doomed to fail.

Clearly, these frames are not suitable at all to be used as Masters. This has to do with the data being only

  • 8bits instead of 16bits.

The LZW compression shouldn't be a problem, since it's lossless, (but I still wouldn't use it then I think)

The 8bits has reduced the original bitdepth with a factor of 14bits - 8bits = 6bits = 2^6 = 64x.

That means that all data values between 0 and 64 in your original data are either 0 or 1 now or

That means that all data values between 64 and 128 in your original data are either 1 or 2 now etc....

This has a great destructuve effect on the quality of your calibration masters, there is severe posterization in the masterframes and valuable information is lost which is needed for calibration.

So this will only work with your camera if you capture the data in 16bits and use that in calibration 😉

Mabula

 


   
ReplyQuote
 Phil
(@philsav8)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter  

Hi Mabula,

I understand my mistake, totally my fault. I have just started using SharpCap to acquire the images (as well as a new scope)  and to keep things simple and to ensure I could see the captured images easily to check focus etc on my laptop while acquiring, I saved as jpg. Never again  😀 The error with the flats makes perfect sense as well. I w=ondered why there was such posterization.

Thanks for your help in pointing me in the right direction 

Phil


   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 4366
 

Hi Phil @philsav8,

No problem 😉 Yes, especially JPGs are terrible. This is because the JPG compression algorithm is very destructive in low light areas, almost all data will simply be gone....

So save your captures in 16bits Fits, I assume Sharpcap can do that and then all should be fine 😉

Mabula


   
ReplyQuote
Share: