20 January 2021: Soon to be released APP 1.083-beta2 : improved comet registration, updated tools, new Star Reducer Tool and more...
16 November 2020 - Wouter van Reeven has officially joined the Astro Pixel Processor Team as a moderator on our forum, welcome Wouter 🙂 !
Drizzle method - Wrong extract output
So finally I've got my dedicated cooled OSC camera (Omegon 533) and I can handle noise a lot better. So it is time to drizzle for better outcome. And it works! I think I would easily manage the extra noise.
For my Ha filter capture I've used : Algorithm Ha, Force Bayer/X-Trans CFA checked, topHatKernel, droplet 0.5, Bayer/X-Trans drizzle, scale 2 = Success
For my Triband filter capture, I've used: Algorithm Ha-Oiii Color, Force Bayer/X-Trans CFA checked, topHatKernel, droplet 0.5, Bayer/X-Trans drizzle, scale 2 = Success
Then as usual I've tried to extract Ha and Oiii into two separate Fits.
So I've used Algorithm Ha-Oiii extract Ha, Force Bayer/X-Trans CFA checked, topHatKernel, droplet 0.5, Bayer/X-Trans drizzle, scale 2 = Fail
I've tried to change from Bayer/X-Trans drizzle to drizzle, and a message appears:
What I am missing?
I have the same problem with my ASI533mc and an L-enhance filter. I guess the bayer drizzle of Ha/OIII extraction is not integrated yet. But I found it in the feature presentation for the next upcoming beta, so we need to wait only a few more days/weeks until this should be possible.
I was using the latest stable version and I was hoping that 1.083 will resolve this...but no 😔
There is an issue with this that is fixed in beta 2, Mabula is working very hard on finishing that. It took a long time this time for which we do apologize, but this is because the update is a complex one this time around.