UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hello
 This is a naive question, as usual...
I have experienced issues to have appropriate rendering on objects with large dynamic range, such as the center of Orion Nebula , for instance.
I hand up with overexposure of the central core.
I my field of skills (terrestrial photo), I would handle it by making several pictures with variable exposure time, and then combine them with an HDR rendering tool.
Â
I think this is of course feasible with astro pictures, but I wonder if APP can handle a set of pictures with different exposures , and handle light dynamic range during the stacking process?
There is one to find out: try it and see.
I have done just this with the Orion Nebula. APP can handle sets of pictures with different exposures and the high dynamic range.
