UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
I have a data set where star analysis fails on quite a few individual subs with 1.084 and none with 1.082 - and these subs look ok. RAW files from EOS RP. I haven't found anything to create a dump of log files. How to properly report this problem?
Regards
Samo
@samol Hi! Let’s start with the version. APP 1.084 doesn’t exist yet. Do you perhaps mean 1.083-beta2? Can you please upload your dataset to
https://upload.astropixelprocessor.com
using upload for both username and password? Please create a directory called samol_failed_registration and I will make sure that Mabula looks at it. Thanks for reporting this error!
@wvreeven yes, it is the latest 1.083-beta. I will upload calibration frames and some frames where star analysis failed and one or two where it didn't.
With registration I also have issues - many times I need to use triangles on wider focal lenghts, which with 1.082 I never did. I will create a set that demonstrates that separately.
Thank you for your support.
Thank you @samol,
I will have a look at your data, thank you for uploading. I am working on the star analysis for the stable version 😉
Mabula