Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Please note our new Downloads page here

2023-01-19: APP 2.0.0-beta13 has been released !

!!! Big performance increase due to optimizations in integration !!!

and upgraded development platform to GraalVM 22.3 based on openJDK19

 

We are very close now to  releasing APP 2.0.0 stable with a complete printable manual...

 

Astro Pixel Processor Windows 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Intel 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Apple M Silicon 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux DEB 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux RPM 64-bit

Saving image after using the Light Pollution tool


(@b777capt)
White Dwarf Customer
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 17
Topic starter  

Hi,

After stacking my subs and seeing the resultant image with all of my light pollution gradients, I usually run the light pollution tool. I have noticed that when the tool finished I have a much improved image with most of the gradients removed. However when I save the same image, some of the gradients return and the saved image isn't the same (or as good) as the image that was present when the LP tool finished. 

I must have a setting wrong somewhere but if so, I can't find it. Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks


ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Universe Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5217
 

I think you're saving the linear unaltered image. You can save a stretched version by clicking on the "save" button on the right-hand side of APP, next to the preview window. Make sure the "stretched" button is checked.


ReplyQuote
(@b777capt)
White Dwarf Customer
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 17
Topic starter  

Thanks,

 

When the Pollution tool is finished, there is a box in that section that says something like "OK and save". I don't use that command to save the LP corrected image?


ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Universe Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5217
 

Yes that saves the corrected image, so that should be the same as what you corrected for. Are you sure you're loading in that particular corrected image?


ReplyQuote
Share: