Share:
Notifications
Clear all

June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !

Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Remove Light Pollution/Background Calibration Questions

7 Posts
4 Users
1 Reactions
2,370 Views
(@edwallace)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 31
Topic starter  

Reposting this from the general forum:

I have 2 questions.

(1)Regarding "remove light pollution/background calibration," when processing an integration which has some nebulosity everywhere in the image, is there a best strategy for making the selection boxes? 

(2)When producing a narrowband image (Ha, OIII, SII), I like to use 2 or 3 different formulas for combining the stacks. Let's say I use the HSO fomula. Then I do the "remove light pollution/calibrate background", etc. When I'm done, I then might combine the stacks using the SHO formula, for a different look. Is it possible to use the same light pollution correction model that I created for the first image? As it is, I have to go through the process of "remove light pollution/calibrate background" all over again. This seems unnecessary. There may be an obvious way to do this, but I haven't found it.

Any guidance would be appreciated



   
George Hart reacted
ReplyQuote
(@snapthot)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 18
 

I’ve had problems with light pollution removal in nebula images as well so I’m also very interested in recommendations how to do it. 



   
ReplyQuote
(@dcaponeii)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 10
 

I also have a lot of challenges when the field is mostly nebulosity.  Of late I've just hitting the corners with the minimum number of boxes.  If you follow the tutorials and increase to the 30% brightness setting in the drop menu of the preview window controls you can sometimes find a spot that has a hole in the nebulosity.  Just be ready to remove the box if it makes the image go wonky.



   
ReplyQuote
(@dcaponeii)
White Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 10
 

@edwallace Are you the Ed Wallace of Dallas radio fame??



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5363
 

Hi @edwallace,

Sorry to have kept you waiting.

The use of the same selection boxes for different images is on our todo list 😉 The best approach is to start with 5-6 area selectboxes and calculate, and then iteratively add 1-2 boxes each time between new calculations to fully correct the whole image in the end. We show this in our mosaic tutorial. It is not advised to immediately place 20-50 boxes and then clicking calculate.

This it the mosaic tutorial that demonstrates this: https://www.astropixelprocessor.com/part-4-light-pollution-correction-and-background-calibration-of-the-mosaic-tutorial-milky-way-to-rho-ophiuchi-by-mabula/

Let me know if this helps 😉

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
(@edwallace)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 31
Topic starter  

@dcaponeii No.



   
ReplyQuote
(@edwallace)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 31
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin Thank you.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: