Automatic frame sel...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

UPDATE FROM MABULA

I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.

 

Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.

 

APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46.  Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.

[Solved] Automatic frame selection by criteria

5 Posts
3 Users
2 Reactions
1,301 Views
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

Hi Mabula,

Would you considder adding the posibility to setup some selection criteria on the light frames to be used in the process?

I mean not only asigning a quality score that lateron assigns a percentage to the frame to be used in the integration.

IMHO it would be beneficial for the final integration to be able to reject frames that do not comply with the setup criteria ( like FWHMmax, ...etc. ) and these frames will not be taken into account for the integration.

This without doing that by hand as is already possible using the framelist, but automagically.

Just an idea?

Kind regards,

Lammertus de Vries



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

Hi Lammertus,

I have notified Mabula of your request. 

Wouter



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5369
 

Hi Lammertus @lammertus,

Indeed, this is on our ToDo list so we will make it possible.

Currently, the APP quality score determines which frames will be integrated using the % slider at the top op 6)Integrate.

We will make it possible, that you can choose which metric to use for the % slider ;-), so then you can opt to stack the best 85% frames in terms of FWHM size, or roundness or shape (size*roundness) for example.

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin Thanks Mabula, that sounds great!

 



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

@wvreeven Thanks Wouter, much apreciated!



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
Share: