Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Mar 28 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta40 will be released in 7 days.

It did take a long time to have the work finished on this and it  will have a major performance boost of 30-50% over 2.0.0-beta39 from calibration to integration. We extensively optimized many critical parts of APP. All has been tested to guarantee correct optimizations. Drizzle and image resampling is much faster for instance, those modules have been completely rewritten. Much less memory usage. LNC 2.0 will be released which works much better and faster than LNC in it's current state. And more, all will be added to the release notes in the coming weeks...

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

What did I do?

7 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1,691 Views
(@andynowlen)
Neutron Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 97
Topic starter  

I am just 6 months into this hobby of Astrophotography.

In the core of M101 something is not right when I zoom in.  I wonder if this is in the captures or in the post-processing? Did I simply blow out the core in capture? or is there anything else I could do to improve the APP stack to avoid the problem I see? 

Asi533mcp - Takahashi FSQ106n - about 7 hours integration total.  300 seconds, 360 seconds, 420 seconds and 600 seconds subframes.

Thanks for your advice.

 

M101 v4d 3 St

I attached JPG, and a tiff of the stack.

M101 v4d 3 mod lpc cbg csc


   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

@andynowlen Hi Andy. The core looks saturated with lots of details around it. What is wrong according to you?



   
ReplyQuote
(@andynowlen)
Neutron Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 97
Topic starter  

@wvreeven

I attached a screenshot of the core area.  Maybe I am overdoing my concern about the 'ring of colors' around the core.  

This is 200% zoom in AAP

Screen Shot 2021 04 30 at 2.23.49 PM

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

@andynowlen Yes it is a bit pink. Do you still have the unprocessed stack?



   
ReplyQuote
(@andynowlen)
Neutron Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 97
Topic starter  
Posted by: @wvreeven

@andynowlen Yes it is a bit pink. Do you still have the unprocessed stack?

Yes.  I think so.  Do you mean 1 fits file?



   
ReplyQuote
(@andynowlen)
Neutron Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 97
Topic starter  

I continue to process this image in different versions.  What do you think the artifacts in this screen clip represent?  It is a 133% view in APP.

Screen Shot 2021 04 30 at 4.33.05 PM

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@wvreeven)
Quasar
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2134
 

@andynowlen You asked in your original post if this could be due to post-processing. So my question is if you see this in the integration result before post-processing. 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: