Quality assessment ...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !

Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Quality assessment of images in the stack

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
2,035 Views
(@minusman)
Black Hole
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 251
Topic starter  

Hello Vincent, Wouter and Mabula. To my question. How does the quality assessment actually work in APP and what are the steps involved? Do you look at the whole picture or just part of it? I ask because I noticed that the star density is not actually comparable with image shifts (unavoidable with dithering). And wouldn't it be better to specify an area after registration in the light frames that overlaps 100% compared to the rest of the lights. Then the images in the stack can be better judged against each other.

With friendly greetings



   
ReplyQuote
(@minusman)
Black Hole
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 251
Topic starter  

Doesn't anyone have an opinion on this? 😟 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5363
 

Hi @minusman,

Quality calculations are revised after each step.

So after 3) Analyse stars, only the star count in the whole image and their median shape (size and roundness) determines the quality score since this is the only thing that we know after that step.

After registration, possible image scale differences are taken into account, so if you shot the data with different camera's, telescopes or sensor binning, APP uses the registration parameters to correct the quality scores that we had after step 3. Furthermore, yes, the registration parameters allow us to use the same area/field of view as the reference frame to correct the other frame scores using the same area as the reference frame area.

Finally after normalization, so images registered and corrected for illumination differences, noise values are also added to the final quality score of the frames.

We will publish the exact formula in the manual that is coming...

Mabula



   
ReplyQuote
(@jhart)
Neutron Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 75
 

Hi,

Could I ask a follow up question?  I understand that the quality scores of the images calculated by 3) Analyse Stars are used to select the best one as the Reference Frame.  Does APP use the recalculated quality scores for the frames in 4) Register or 5) Normalize for any purpose?

Thanks, Jeff



   
ReplyQuote
(@minusman)
Black Hole
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 251
Topic starter  

Hi Mabula, thanks for the reply. I just do not know yet which reference range is meant.
1. whole reference frame (green area)

Bildschirmfoto vom 2022 07 19 17 34 39

2. or only the area where the images overlap (red rectangle)

Bildschirmfoto vom 2022 07 19 17 35 03

Option 2 would have the advantage that one can judge the transparency (by clouds, light pollution, etc.) of the individual frames in relation to the reference frame better on the basis of the star number.
The images above serve only as an example.

Or am I wrong?

With kind regards

 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: