Ignoring lights bas...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

2023-03-15: APP 2.0.0-beta14 has been released !

IMPROVED FRAME LIST, sorting on column header click and you can move the columns now which will be preserved between restarts.

 

We are very close now to  releasing APP 2.0.0 stable with a complete printable manual...

 

Astro Pixel Processor Windows 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Intel 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Apple M Silicon 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux DEB 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux RPM 64-bit

Ignoring lights based on quality score

5 Posts
2 Users
0 Likes
100 Views
(@jpiquette)
White Dwarf
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 8
Topic starter  

I have a set of lights where the quality score varies significantly from one to the next. Is it possible for me to set a quality score threshhold to be used during integration where lights falling below the threshhold will not be included in the stack? If not, is there some other parameter (possibly kappa) that could be set to achieve effectively the same results as if lights with a low quality had had been ignored?

Jean 


   
ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Universe Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5386
 

You can use the slider in the integrate tab to stack a % of subs based on the score. That would likely be what you're looking for.


   
ReplyQuote
(@jpiquette)
White Dwarf
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 8
Topic starter  

Thanks for the reply. But just to be clear: If the top quality score is 100 and I set the slider to 80%, that means all lights with a score of 80 or better will be used, even that means only, say, 60% of the lights will be stacked. Do I have that right?

Jean


   
ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Universe Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5386
 

It means that you'll be stacking 80% of all frames, where 20% will have a lower quality value than those 80%. You can see how many frames will not be included under the slider.


   
ReplyQuote
(@jpiquette)
White Dwarf
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 8
Topic starter  

OK. Thanks.

Jean

 


   
ReplyQuote
Share: