June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !
Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.
May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !
Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.
Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options
Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual
We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.
Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.
I have a set of lights where the quality score varies significantly from one to the next. Is it possible for me to set a quality score threshhold to be used during integration where lights falling below the threshhold will not be included in the stack? If not, is there some other parameter (possibly kappa) that could be set to achieve effectively the same results as if lights with a low quality had had been ignored?
JeanÂ
You can use the slider in the integrate tab to stack a % of subs based on the score. That would likely be what you're looking for.
Thanks for the reply. But just to be clear: If the top quality score is 100 and I set the slider to 80%, that means all lights with a score of 80 or better will be used, even that means only, say, 60% of the lights will be stacked. Do I have that right?
Jean
It means that you'll be stacking 80% of all frames, where 20% will have a lower quality value than those 80%. You can see how many frames will not be included under the slider.
OK. Thanks.
Jean
Â
