Tool to clarify def...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Please note our new Downloads page here

2023-01-19: APP 2.0.0-beta13 has been released !

!!! Big performance increase due to optimizations in integration !!!

and upgraded development platform to GraalVM 22.3 based on openJDK19

 

We are very close now to  releasing APP 2.0.0 stable with a complete printable manual...

 

Astro Pixel Processor Windows 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Intel 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor macOS Apple M Silicon 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux DEB 64-bit

Astro Pixel Processor Linux RPM 64-bit

Tool to clarify deficiencies in calibration files


 momo
(@mo-mo)
Red Giant Customer
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 121
Topic starter  

Hello everyone.

I have been reading the forum and what I have noticed is that the calibration files often cause integration problems. I think this speaks to the importance of calibration files.
On the other hand, taking a calibration file is not an exciting experience. Perhaps many astrophotographers would prefer shooting nebula to shooting calibration files.

I am beginning to wish there was a tool for APP to test the quality of calibration files. Of course, even now the APP pops up a few notes about the calibration file.
Since it is displayed only after processing has begun, my suggestion is that the APP should be able to clearly indicate deficiencies in the calibration file that can be seen before processing.

Thanks for reading.


ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Universe Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5218
 

I think it's quite difficult to really know if calibration data is correct or not this likely depends a lot on the characteristics of a sensor and there are many of those arround. What APP does see is that if pixels turn black, that you likely have an issue, but it can only tell that after having used it on actual data.


ReplyQuote
 momo
(@mo-mo)
Red Giant Customer
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 121
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod 

Thank you Vincent,

I agree that it is difficult to judge exactly as you say. Still, I think it would save the user a lot of time and effort if the judgment could be made on basic factors (e.g., temperature, exposure time, resolution, etc.) by cross-checking with the light frame information.


ReplyQuote
(@vincent-mod)
Universe Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5218
 

Yes, it already does this basically. In the sense that it will not use the calibration data if it doesn't match regarding gain and such. It doesn't produce a big warning no, we may add that, but there is always a limit to what people want to see as warnings. 🙂 Maybe a setting for the future.


ReplyQuote
 momo
(@mo-mo)
Red Giant Customer
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 121
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod 

Perhaps the user is not aware that there is a problem with the calibration file until a warning is issued. It would make sense to eliminate the cause of the problem beforehand before proceeding with the APP process, rather than looking for the cause after the warning is issued.

If the tool were available, the user would recognize that failing that test does not meet the basic requirements. It would also seem to reduce the number of similar cause-related questions that are repeated on the forum.

While I would welcome a detailed description of the principles of calibration files in the manual that is being prepared, users would benefit if the tool freed them from visual verification.

This is not a new feature suggestion, but I still believe it makes sense for the APP to be widely used.

Thank you


ReplyQuote
Share: