June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !
Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.
May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !
Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.
Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options
Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual
We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.
Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.
Hi all @mabula-admin
Normally I use „full mode“ in 6)Integration, and subsequently crop the edges away to eliminate the dither/drizzle artefacts.
Now I needed to use „crop mode“, to reduce the TeraBytes of work files needed for my 1028 frames at drizzle scale 2.0 😉
--> Question: are the edges clean, or do I still need to crop the artefacts away?
(I checked visually: looks as if there are no artefacts)
Thank you and best regards.
Michael
Hi Michael,
Great question, if you use the crop mode and are sure that you select a field of view away of the edges were the artefacts appear, then the resulting integration should be artefact free for sure 😉
Using the crop does not create artefacts in different areas of the field of view when compared to full mode.
The artefacts that you want to avoid exist because of drizzle, the borders of the individual frame in combination with outlier rejection. Those spots will be the same, if you crop that away in the composition it should be gone 😉
Let me know if all is okay when you try it,
Mabula
Thank you, Mabula.
Yes, I tried ... and it looked okay, but I wanted assortment, before I do all the linear processing and stretching.
