SHO (Hubble) 1 vs 2...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !

Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

SHO (Hubble) 1 vs 2?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,424 Views
(@sdvanblarcom)
Brown Dwarf
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5
Topic starter  

I have used the SHO (Hubble) 1 formula when combining integrations taken with separate Ha, Oiii, Sii filters on a mono camera.  Now I am trying to combine integrations with Ha, Oii extracted from an L-eNhance filter using a OSC camera.  YouTube tuturials recommend using the SHO (Hubble) 2 formula.  

When should Hubble 2 be used instead of 1?

Thanks

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

That is basically up to you, narrowband combinations are more artistic than anything else. These are just different presets for the formula, which you can tweak to your liking as well.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: