UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hi!
I have ventured to the Orion Nebula for the first time, and have now realized in retrospect that I do not have it in the ideal position. I would like to use the next night to shift it slightly, so that it is ideally in the center and I do not have to cut away much.
I would now be interested if I can somehow combine the data with the somewhat unfavorable section with the future with better section. And in such a way that I have the better cutout later.
Is that possible?
Thanks!
@dv_stranger Hi Dane, yes APP will be able to handle that. Note, however, that the parts that do not overlap will have less data and therefore contain more noise. The edges of the two fields may become visible as well which can be reduced by increasing MBB in tab 6.
If the overlap becomes very small you essentially are creating a mosaic and you’ll need to modify some of the parameters in tabs 3, 4, 5 and 6 but for now let’s assume that won’t be necessary.
Hi Wouter,
thank you, then I will try to increase the MBB value. I know that it then has less information at the parts with less exposuretime, but I would like to avoid hard transitions in this parts. It would be good if the sessions had a smooth transition.
I try it. Thank you!
