UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hello,
when doing a mosaic like the one in Mabula's big tutorial with my data and I use two different cameras, how do I do this? I realized that my unmodded Nikon D750 is quite ok with AP but needs different treatment in star color analysis than my D810a. Usually you proceed in stacking each setting before using the stack (panels) for combining them into a mosaic. This is done without previous lightpollution or Sc-calibration. But when I combine stacks of different cameras with like different green cast as with the 2 Nikons wouldn't I get into trouble?
stefan
Data taken with different camera's and setups shouldn't be a problem at all as this was part of the extensive testing Mabula did in the beginning. He created some stunning results with data taken by a lot of different people into 1 image. So what you could do is try to go with the data at once and deselecting "same camera and optics" in the register module (4). Or, integrate them seperately and combining the stacked results. In the post-processing, the background neutralisation and color correction tools should take care of the rest (as well as the LNC or Local Normalisation Correction in the integrate module).
Data taken with different camera's and setups shouldn't be a problem at all as this was part of the extensive testing Mabula did in the beginning. He created some stunning results with data taken by a lot of different people into 1 image. So what you could do is try to go with the data at once and deselecting "same camera and optics" in the register module (4). Or, integrate them seperately and combining the stacked results. In the post-processing, the background neutralisation and color correction tools should take care of the rest (as well as the LNC or Local Normalisation Correction in the integrate module).
if that works then it'd be great. just thought that local mixed colors due to implementation of different sensors in a mosaic could influence this. LNC etc. would be indeed powerful. Light pollution correction does not influence star colors that much so I thought here could be a problem ...
It shouldn't be a big problem, unless something very specific causes an issue between the data. The proof will be in the pudding!
Hi Stefan @elgol & Vincent @vincent-mod,
In my experience, if you shoot the data from the same field of view with 2 different camera's then there should be no problem in combining this properly.
Howeverm if you are creating a mosaic, and you shoot the mosaic panels with different camera's, then things might start to become complicated very quickly, especially is the difference between the camera's is big. A Nikon D810a and a Nikon D750 are a bit different, the D810a will show H-alpha regions much more prominent. Some holds for combining data into a mosaic where 1 panel is done without a filter and the other panel is done with for instance a LPS filter. Then you will run into problems normally.
Kind regards,
Mabula
Ah right, good catch, yes those are problematic ofcourse as the data itself is then not comparable anymore.
