UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hello,
I´ve read several entries and explanations concerning LNC but still have the following question:
Is LNC performed twice when using an LNC setting other than "no LNC" and an LNC rejection filter? Or are the LNC settings for the LNC rejection filters? I believe not. So under normal circumstances it seems to make sense to leave the LNC setting at "no LNC" if an LNC rejection filter is used, right?
Best wishes,
Ulf
Good question, I think it's a good idea to use LNC anyway (correction), it's off by default as it increases memory use and slows down the process quite a bit, but it is effective to have. I'm actually not sure if these are completely separate, they appear to be in the way it's layed out, but I'll ask Mabula about this.
Vincent, I think your memory is failing you or your info outdated. When I hover my mouse over the "LNC degree" drop down it specifies that with data from one night LNC probably will have little effect and will be visually hard to see.
Still, Ulf has asked an interesting question.
Wouter
Thanks for the infos! Would be interesting to hear, what Mabula says.
Best wishes,
Ulf
Vincent, I think your memory is failing you or your info outdated.
As I've worked in science during my entire career, I'm very used to criticism and welcome it. I can make wrong assumptions, but I'm the first to double check those when that is pointed out and then thank the one for pointing it out. I'm sure you didn't mean the above in a bad way, but I'd like discussions here to be respectful.
When I hover my mouse over the "LNC degree" drop down it specifies that with data from one night LNC probably will have little effect and will be visually hard to see.
Still, Ulf has asked an interesting question.
Yes, on a single session it indeed won't make a big difference, if at all. I just check it anyway as it doesn't hurt either and may still correct some small variations. If your system is not the best, I would not do that for a single session indeed. Me personally, I rarely have data from just 1 night to stack so it's something I always do anyway.
Thanks for the infos! Would be interesting to hear, what Mabula says.
Best wishes,
Ulf
He should be coming back to you shortly. 🙂
@vindent-mod, sorry I didn't mean to offend you. I'll try to word my comments more carefully next time.
No worries Wouter, I figured as much and thank you. 🙂
