L-eXtreme Ha Oiii r...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !

Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

L-eXtreme Ha Oiii results identical

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
2,253 Views
(@ab4090)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 5
Topic starter  

My first time processing data from the L-eXtreme filter. When I run both the extract Ha and then the extract Oiii the resulting images of IC63 are identical.

I’m using version 1.082. On the 0) tab I select Ha-Oiii extract Ha, then load the lights, flats, darks and darkflats after which I go to the integrate tab and select integrate. Once that’s done back to the 0) tab and select Ha-Oiii extract Oiii and then select the integrate tab again and integrate. I’ve tried it numerous times and the resulting images are identical.

Any insight as to what I’m doing wrong would be appreciated.

Alex



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Might be related to a bug we had in 1.082. Would you mind trying the 1.083 beta?



   
ReplyQuote
(@scotty38)
White Dwarf
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 17
 

Just as an aside I did this exact same thing last week, albeit with IC1396, and my output files were different as expected.

 

Oh with 1.082 by the way....


This post was modified 5 years ago by Martin Scott

   
ReplyQuote
(@ab4090)
White Dwarf
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 5
Topic starter  
Posted by: @vincent-mod

Might be related to a bug we had in 1.082. Would you mind trying the 1.083 beta?

I installed 1.083 beta and it solved the issue. Must have been a bug in my 1.082 install.

Thx Vincent!



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Were you drizzling as well by any chance? That at least didn't work properly in 1.082 in this workflow.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: