UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
I'm not understanding what's up with my integrated image. It ends up all green. The individual frames, after normalization, look fine (I've attached one). But the integrated image looks all green (attached also). I'm using a ASI533MC and an Optolong L-Pro filter. In tab 0, I chose RGGB pattern, Adaptive Airy Disc for algorithm, and checked the force Bayer/X-Trans CFA box. I'm using the defaults for the other tabs. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Mark
@mfschmitz There are strange bands to the top and bottom of the integrated result that indicate an issue with some of the calibration frames. How does the integration result look when you don’t use flats?
@mfschmitz There barely is any difference between the two images, apart from the fact that the upper left and lower right corners suddenly have become purple. What result do you get it you simply integrate the images without any calibration files at all?
@mfschmitz How did you take the darks? Were they the same exposure time, temperature, gain and offset as the lights? And taken with the same software as the lights?
@wvreeven It's the darks! Here is the integrated image using lights, flats and dark flats. Looks much better. I guess I'll be making some new darks -- the ones I was using are only a couple of months old.
Â
Thanks for your help.Â
Mark
Â
@wvreeven The old darks were all the same temperature, gain and exposure time. Not really sure why they made the problem, but I'll take some new ones and see how that goes.
