I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
For LRGB O3 we do not have a preset in the tool. I would suggest that you use a formula that is close to this like LRGBHOO, and load the L,R,G,B, O3 stacks and click on calculate. Then tweak the provided formula to have the O3 signal show nicely combined with the other channels.
To be clear, there is no such thing as the best way here, really, it depends greatly on the quality of your data and the object itself to say what a good formula would be to get a nice looking composite 😉 You need to play with the formula and be a bit creative as well here.
Thanks, i try it, and im think it goes in the right direction. See the result:
I have two questions:
1. I stacked with the standard settings. I only change the LNC degrees and literations, and also increase the MBB to 10% because the data ist from several nights. But why i get the trails from the satellites?Â
2. The stars have sometimes a little bit green borders. Can i avoid this with a setting in the stacking process?
Thanks, i try it, and im think it goes in the right direction. See the result:
I have two questions:
1. I stacked with the standard settings. I only change the LNC degrees and literations, and also increase the MBB to 10% because the data ist from several nights. But why i get the trails from the satellites?Â
2. The stars have sometimes a little bit green borders. Can i avoid this with a setting in the stacking process?
1) how many frames did you stack, if it is not too many, you might need to disable the automatic integration and set it either median or average and set outlier rejection parameters yourself 😉
2) The green borders would be caused by the green data having less focus maybe? Maybe you can run the green data in the star reducer and reduce their size to 90% and see if that improves things?
I gutes this comes from the RGB data, because for only the colour, i take maybe 30-40 shots per channel. O3 and luminance are more. So i can Set this settings only for rgb?Â
