Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Mar 28 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta40 will be released in 7 days.

It did take a long time to have the work finished on this and it  will have a major performance boost of 30-50% over 2.0.0-beta39 from calibration to integration. We extensively optimized many critical parts of APP. All has been tested to guarantee correct optimizations. Drizzle and image resampling is much faster for instance, those modules have been completely rewritten. Much less memory usage. LNC 2.0 will be released which works much better and faster than LNC in it's current state. And more, all will be added to the release notes in the coming weeks...

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Luminous stars problem: they are big

7 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
624 Views
(@luca-argalia)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 28
Topic starter  

I have been using AstropixelProcessor for at least 4 years, and I feel very well, it is simple and gives me a good file to work on, unlike other soft and more powerful software.
I noticed, however, that in the final image if I have very bright stars (an alnitak example in horse head) the star appears to me very large,
Which before when I used another software did not happen!. The stellar reduction does not work, also because then the other stars are fine and are in line with my instrument, a Takahashi FSQ106; I tried to rework a shot of when I used a canon 40d with astropixelprocessor, it improved .. but the limose stars are larger! ..
In the attached photo those stars are even doubles, which with the old software distinguished them, now no longer and looks like a single and bigger star!.

Is there any parameter to set during the processing phase? I usually do not touch anything and it is as if it decides the software .. what is wrong?

Canon   Iris
canon   app

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@astrogee)
Black Hole
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 222
 

I'm interested the responses on this one but to me it looks more like a filter, lens or OTA issue. The second image does look way over-processed. Best to reset APP to factory defaults when something like this goes awry.



   
ReplyQuote
(@connor231)
Neutron Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 101
 

Luca

It looks to me that the image has been overstretched to the point where the faintest parts of the diffracted light around the brighter stars have been made visible by APP.

Don't take that as a criticism - its something I often do myself. The solution I often use is to save two stretches, a weaker stretch for the stars and a stronger (probably overstretched) version for the nebulosity. I take the stars out of one and the nebulosity out of the other and combine them in Gimp.

I use Starnet++ for this. I'm sure the star removal tool in APP can do it too, but to be honest I've had trouble getting the hang of it.

JC

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@luca-argalia)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 28
Topic starter  

Yes, I perhaps pulled the image a little, I wanted to see the differences on some of my old photos taken with the SLR many years ago .. to separate the stars I use the Starxterminator, but I see that the stars problem is already in the linear phase..Allego the photo that came out of the app without making any modification.

ELEPHANT RGB FINAL APP

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@astrogee)
Black Hole
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 222
 

That "luminous star" above the nebula is actually three bright stars that should be separated in your image. So either the instrument is severely compromised or the image is over processed - don't use any exterminators or reduction tools - just integrate and auto-stretch to see what you get. I have an ES ED102CF, similar to the Tak and the three stars are separated.

I've gotten confused. I don't know if you are posting DSLR or Tak images, or if you are illustrating changes in the software or the camera or both. I suggest you reset APP to factory settings and start your analysis from an unmodified sub from the Tak - forget about the DSLR, its just confusing the issue. I assume the Tak is excellent but better to inspect it. And anything you may have changed on the Tak after the focuser - like an extension tube or reducer - may be introducing stray light.

Also, you might try doing a complete integration without any calibration frames - a good way of troubleshooting some processing issues but probably not going to help in this case.

Good luck



   
ReplyQuote
(@luca-argalia)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 28
Topic starter  

@astrogee 

To make the problem understand I initially posted two crop of photographs; I chose an old photo taken many years ago because I could have a comparison with an old software and the new;
The first photo is made with the Iris software,
No longer updated for 15 years and you can see that triple star and from the image it is seen (perhaps the compression has crouched a little), the second image instead developed with AstropixelProcessor, and that triple star disappears making a unique large star,
The third photo is always from Astropixel but the linear without any kind of processing and you can see the triple star which is always as if it were unique; So it should be something linked to the software and not to the instrument.

I also looked at the roughs not elaborated with my new room a QHY168C,
And the stars are the bright and intrusive ones are not so large, a portfilt has been added to the optical train, which was not there before, I was not there, I use a UV/IR Cut Astronomik filter, I think of a good workmanship.

Thanks for the intervention



   
ReplyQuote
(@luca-argalia)
Red Giant
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 28
Topic starter  

I attach other comparison; Fit files from QHY without changes, and finished elaborate file (they are cut out)

 

original fit
final


   
ReplyQuote
Share: