Stacking debayered ...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

June 24 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta46 has been released !

Improved internal memory configuration (lower ! memory usage), fixed beta45 startup issue, fixed Set Save Directory & 2-panel mosaics.

May 27 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta45 has been released !

Fully Multi-Threaded LNC, many improvements for the registration engine, platform upgrade, and further tuning of internal memory consumption and memory release back to OS.

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Stacking debayered and non-debayered fits files together

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,058 Views
(@col)
Neutron Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 127
Topic starter  

Hi APP team,

Query.

I have a session of files that I previously calibrated and aligned channels using APP. They are now fully debayered and calibrated fits files.

In another session, I have yet to process, so they are as-acquired fits files together with their calibration frames. I am not going to align the channels on this second session.

Can I load the calibrated, debayered files as session 1, and also add session 2 with fits files + calibration frames and stack together? I assume no issue as they are treated separately before being integrated?

 

Thanks, Colm



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

That should be possible yes, or if you want to make it even simpler, just process the other session on its own, then load that integration together with the first.



   
ReplyQuote
(@col)
Neutron Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 127
Topic starter  

@vincent-mod

Thanks Vincent. One of them is APO data, different optics, so I was hoping to be able to integrate all together for good rejection, LNC etc., also because of different moonshine levels. The framing is almost 60 degree rotated between the two scope so I will probable need flip descriptors also. Not sure if I should use mosaic registration though? I will try integrating all subs together first as session 1 and 2 and see how it goes.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Well yes that may help, if you have enough data for that one session though it shouldn't make a big difference. But doing it like this should be fine. Don't use mosaic settings for a similar FOV, a mosaic really means panels that have no overlap whatsoever basically.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: