UPDATE FROM MABULA
I have had a very rough 2 months unfortunately health wise. I was struck 3x in a row with bacterial infections. The second infection occurred  after a routine hospital checkup and I became very sick. I had to rest and take a lot of antibiotics. Once I was recovering and restarting work 1 month ago, I again became sick. The infection was not yet gone, so even more antibiotics and rest was needed. Needless to say, it took a lot of my energy and I needed a lot of rest.
Finally, the infection is really gone and my energy is coming back step-by-step now and I have started work again. I am terribly sorry to have kept you waiting for support. I will address all outstanding questions and e-mails step-by step and will be on the forum daily from today.
APP 2.0.0-beta47 will come soon as well, a lot of work was already completed before I became very ill, so the release is also nearly ready for you. Beta47 will be much faster actually. Many workflows will be more than 2x faster, mosaics can even be 10x faster than before because registration really received a major boost... all compared to beta46. Â Before I release it, I will make sure that everything is working properly and then I will release it.
Hi APP team,
Query.
I have a session of files that I previously calibrated and aligned channels using APP. They are now fully debayered and calibrated fits files.
In another session, I have yet to process, so they are as-acquired fits files together with their calibration frames. I am not going to align the channels on this second session.
Can I load the calibrated, debayered files as session 1, and also add session 2 with fits files + calibration frames and stack together? I assume no issue as they are treated separately before being integrated?
Â
Thanks, Colm
That should be possible yes, or if you want to make it even simpler, just process the other session on its own, then load that integration together with the first.
@vincent-mod
Thanks Vincent. One of them is APO data, different optics, so I was hoping to be able to integrate all together for good rejection, LNC etc., also because of different moonshine levels. The framing is almost 60 degree rotated between the two scope so I will probable need flip descriptors also. Not sure if I should use mosaic registration though? I will try integrating all subs together first as session 1 and 2 and see how it goes.
Well yes that may help, if you have enough data for that one session though it shouldn't make a big difference. But doing it like this should be fine. Don't use mosaic settings for a similar FOV, a mosaic really means panels that have no overlap whatsoever basically.
