Share:
Notifications
Clear all

MAY 4 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta44 has been released !

New improved internal memory controls should now work on all computers

May 1 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta43 has been released !

Improved internal memory controls (much more stable and faster on big datasets), fixed CPU image viewer, fixed Narrowband extraction demosaic algortihms.

Apr 29 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta42 has been released !

New improved Normalization engine, Fixed random crashes in integration, fixed RGB Combine & Calibrate Star Colors, fixed Narrowband extraction algorithms, new development platform with performance gains, bug fixes in the tools, etc...

Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options

Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual

We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.

Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.

 

Flats mess

6 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
2,070 Views
(@b777capt)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 17
Topic starter  

I'm having an issue with my flats. It started when I began taking flats with my Skywatcher 200P. Same camera and my RASA, the flats seem fine.

I'm using an ASI 2600 MC Pro, NBZ filter, Moonlite focuser. I use SGP to take the flats. 30,000 ADU and with the NBZ and with the 2600, the flats are about 6 seconds. I use a tracing light panel and a T shirt stretched (smoothly) over the scope.

I have attached an image without the flats, the master flat and an image after applying the flats. Interestingly enough, I had same issue with an ASI 294 MC attached to the same scope.

I suspect something is wrong with the flats acquisition or my processing in APP. A setting maybe??? 

I can't take the image train apart to make the darks until I figure this out....

Any comments on the image itself would also be welcome.....:-)

Any ideas?

 

Thanks

NGC 7000 test 1 session 1 session 2 lpc cbg St
MF IG 0.0 E 6.39s ASI Camera 1  6248x4176  St
M31 Flats test St

 


This topic was modified 5 years ago by B777Capt

   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

This looks like the flats are not matching the lights basically. Are you correcting the flats with a proper darkflat or bias (bias being 0.5 seconds of exposure, not much shorter)? What is the offset of both the lights and the flats?



   
ReplyQuote
(@b777capt)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 17
Topic starter  

Thanks for the reply. 

As I said, the camera is an ASI 2600 MC P. I used "highest dynamic range" which sets the offset to 50. The lights and the flats were shot at that setting. With that said, I used 30,000 ADU as the target and with my present T shirt thickness, the flat exposure was about 6 seconds. Maybe I need to re-shoot at 2 seconds (take a layer out of the t shirts).

I haven't done the bias frames yet as I didn't want to take the train apart before I figured out the issue with the flats.

 

Thanks again

 

Lynn



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

Well, 6 seconds can be fine if that produces proper flats, target seems good though I would aim for higher, just making sure not to clip on the right-hand side. You do need to calibrate the flats with a bias or dark-flat though for it to work nicely.



   
ReplyQuote
(@b777capt)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 17
Topic starter  

High again,

So, I reshot the flats at 2.1 seconds and 25,000 ADU. Then I took the train apart and using SGP wizard, I shot 100 bias frames. I dumped the lights (two sessions) the flats and the bias frames into APP and let it process. Came out great, the big halo was gone. I'm not sure if the shorter flats or the bias frames fixed it, but I suspect it was correctly shot bias frames that made the difference.

From your comment above, are you saying that the flat ADU should be higher? If so, what would be a good target?

 

Thanks


This post was modified 4 years ago by B777Capt

   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 174)
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 5702
 

I think it more likely was the bias yes. Glad it worked!

Regarding flats, yes it's better to go for an ADU which is more to the right of the histogram (just make sure it doesn't clip). So 60-70% may work better, especially when you're taking flats at gain 0, for maximum dynamic range. This will ensure that there's way less chance of an issue at the lower end of the signal.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: