MAY 4 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta44 has been released !
New improved internal memory controls should now work on all computers
May 1 2026: APP 2.0.0-beta43 has been released !
Improved internal memory controls (much more stable and faster on big datasets), fixed CPU image viewer, fixed Narrowband extraction demosaic algortihms.
Apr 29 2026 APP 2.0.0-beta42 has been released !
New improved Normalization engine, Fixed random crashes in integration, fixed RGB Combine & Calibrate Star Colors, fixed Narrowband extraction algorithms, new development platform with performance gains, bug fixes in the tools, etc...
Apr 14 2026: Google Pay, Apple Pay & WeChat Pay added as payment options
Update on the 2.0.0 release & the full manual
We are getting close to the 2.0.0 stable release and the full manual. The manual will soon become available on the website and also in PDF format. Both versions will be identical and once released, will start to follow the APP release cycle and thus will stay up-to-date to the latest APP version.
Once 2.0.0 is released, the price for APP will increase. Owner's license holders will not need to pay an upgrade fee to use 2.0.0, neither do Renter's license holders.
I'm having an issue with my flats. It started when I began taking flats with my Skywatcher 200P. Same camera and my RASA, the flats seem fine.
I'm using an ASI 2600 MC Pro, NBZ filter, Moonlite focuser. I use SGP to take the flats. 30,000 ADU and with the NBZ and with the 2600, the flats are about 6 seconds. I use a tracing light panel and a T shirt stretched (smoothly) over the scope.
I have attached an image without the flats, the master flat and an image after applying the flats. Interestingly enough, I had same issue with an ASI 294 MC attached to the same scope.
I suspect something is wrong with the flats acquisition or my processing in APP. A setting maybe???Â
I can't take the image train apart to make the darks until I figure this out....
Any comments on the image itself would also be welcome.....:-)
Any ideas?
Â
Thanks
Â
This looks like the flats are not matching the lights basically. Are you correcting the flats with a proper darkflat or bias (bias being 0.5 seconds of exposure, not much shorter)? What is the offset of both the lights and the flats?
Thanks for the reply.Â
As I said, the camera is an ASI 2600 MC P. I used "highest dynamic range" which sets the offset to 50. The lights and the flats were shot at that setting. With that said, I used 30,000 ADU as the target and with my present T shirt thickness, the flat exposure was about 6 seconds. Maybe I need to re-shoot at 2 seconds (take a layer out of the t shirts).
I haven't done the bias frames yet as I didn't want to take the train apart before I figured out the issue with the flats.
Â
Thanks again
Â
Lynn
Well, 6 seconds can be fine if that produces proper flats, target seems good though I would aim for higher, just making sure not to clip on the right-hand side. You do need to calibrate the flats with a bias or dark-flat though for it to work nicely.
High again,
So, I reshot the flats at 2.1 seconds and 25,000 ADU. Then I took the train apart and using SGP wizard, I shot 100 bias frames. I dumped the lights (two sessions) the flats and the bias frames into APP and let it process. Came out great, the big halo was gone. I'm not sure if the shorter flats or the bias frames fixed it, but I suspect it was correctly shot bias frames that made the difference.
From your comment above, are you saying that the flat ADU should be higher? If so, what would be a good target?
Â
Thanks
I think it more likely was the bias yes. Glad it worked!
Regarding flats, yes it's better to go for an ADU which is more to the right of the histogram (just make sure it doesn't clip). So 60-70% may work better, especially when you're taking flats at gain 0, for maximum dynamic range. This will ensure that there's way less chance of an issue at the lower end of the signal.


