Debayer pattern for...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

2026-10-09 APP 2.0.0-beta48 has been released !

This is mainly a bug fix release for the reported bugs in beta47. In addition it has a significant User Interface performance improvement noticable when you need to process 1000s of images in APP.

2026-10-03 APP 2.0.0-beta47 has been released !

This is a very big release... many code optimizations/rewrites, many parts of APP are much faster and more precise, especially star analysis and registration are much faster ! Big mosaics will go much faster 🙂

And we introduce a new preview filter, which includes the new Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch and a General Levels Stretch, this has been long over due. The old preview filter (the panel on the right side to stretch and preview your data) has not been updated for a couple of years and it is a critical part of any APP session.

Adaptive Deep Sky Stretch or ADSS is a much more intuitive stretch algorithm. It is also color preserving (which is a great new addition in itself ! ) which means that the highlights are no longer bleached, color is maintained from the linear data while stretching. You can simply stretch your data using the sky background level and signal width sliders which work much easier and more intuitive. You no longer need to fiddle with the old complicated sliders with zoom buttons. All the zoom buttons for the sliders are made redundant. And you can enter slider values in the slider value fields yourself. I will make a youtube video in the coming days to explain and fully introduce ADSS. Once the video is ready, it will be highlighted on the forum.

RGB Combine upgrade !. The RGB Combine Tool has been rewritten mostly. The tool is faster and easier to use and most importantly, the Luminance slider to inject a luminance channel or channels into the RGB composite is now working correctly. It no longer bleaches the RGB colors. Combined with the new ADSS preview, you will get much better and easier great composites with great color! I will also explain this in a new youtube video.

Debayer pattern for Touptek2600C ( IMX571 )

17 Posts
4 Users
1 Reactions
1,942 Views
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

Hi all,

I just received a new Touptek2600C camera and get a very strong green cast over

the integration when I use the RGGB debayer mask.

If there is someone with the same camera, could you please tell me what debayer

mask you use?

Thanks a lot!

Regards, Mert


This topic was modified 2 years ago by Mabula-Admin

   
ReplyQuote
(@digitaliz-se)
Neutron Star
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 115
 

Have you checked the neutralize background option? All OSC will make a  green tint if this is not enabled. There are more green pixels than blue or red.



   
Mabula-Admin reacted
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

Thanks Stefan, I know about a bit of postprocessing but was asking for the correct bayer pattern to use.

By the way, that option takes the green cast away but could also be done in PixInsight for example.

Right now I'm experimenting with different masks and for the moment RBGGG.... etc seems to

give the correct/normal greyish looking output. ( Efectively turns out Gray-scale image )

When I apply a masterflat I made yesterday things turn up terribly green so that's likely the

culprit but when stacking without masterflat using RGGB as debayer mask, things come out terribly

green again!

Of course I was imaging from my lightpoluted balcony so that's also an important factor.

Maybe will do some testing with an L-Extreme filter to get rid of the light polution.

That's why I'm asking, I'm confused at the moment.

Regards,

Mert

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 5464
 

Posted by: @digitaliz-se
↑

Have you checked the neutralize background option? All OSC will make a  green tint if this is not enabled. There are more green pixels than blue or red.

Thank you very much Stefan @digitaliz-se for assisting here. The main reason for the data to look green is not that there are 2x green pixels over red and blue ones, but rather that the sensor, as most sensors, is more sensitive in the green wavelengths when compared to red and blue wavelengths 😉

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 5464
 

Posted by: @lammertus
↑

Thanks Stefan, I know about a bit of postprocessing but was asking for the correct bayer pattern to use.

By the way, that option takes the green cast away but could also be done in PixInsight for example.

Right now I'm experimenting with different masks and for the moment RBGGG.... etc seems to

give the correct/normal greyish looking output. ( Efectively turns out Gray-scale image )

When I apply a masterflat I made yesterday things turn up terribly green so that's likely the

culprit but when stacking without masterflat using RGGB as debayer mask, things come out terribly

green again!

Of course I was imaging from my lightpoluted balcony so that's also an important factor.

Maybe will do some testing with an L-Extreme filter to get rid of the light polution.

That's why I'm asking, I'm confused at the moment.

Regards,

Mert

 

Hi Mert,

Does the camera maker provide information on the correct Bayer mask? It could very well be that RGGB is the correct one, and that simply the combination of your sky conditions and filter used, makes the result very green.  Best way to know if you have the correct mask is to apply Background Calibration to your stacked result or simply on an individual light frame. Background Calibration is one of the Tools in the TOOLS tab. That is more accurate than the background neutralization option below the histogram. After background calibration the sky should be dark gray and the bright stars should be blue and the smaller stars red. Then you know for sure it is correct.

Let me know if this helps 😉 or if you want me to have a look at your data as well.

Mabula

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin  Hi Mabula,

Yes, the camera maker states it is RGGB.

I was quite confused seeing soo strong green cast over the integration.

When I used my ASI1600MCC there was no such strong green cast but as you say,

and very likely, the camera is much more sensitive in green then in the rest.

But then again, using the background neutralization things go back to normal again.

Also true is that the skybackground from my balcony is horrible, most of the

ties between Bortle 7 and 8 ( mostly above 8 )

Thanks for your help, much apreciated!

Mert

 

PD: an example image of the SQM seen from my balcony. 🙁

( This with my DIY observationconditions device plus it's ascom driver )

SQM


   
ReplyQuote
(@tvanpeer)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 23
 

I have the same Touptek camera. These are my settings in tab 0 and I have neutralize background checked. Never had a green cast.

Screenshot 2025 04 05 at 18.56.40


   
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

Thanks a lot Tom, I will reprocess accordingly and see what happens.

Only thing that comes to my mind is the white balance of the camera that

can not be adjusted in the driver(s). ( at least not in the versions I tried )

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@tvanpeer)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 23
 

I think the camera white balance checkbox only applies to DSLRs and system cameras. I wouldn’t bother too much about that.



   
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

Just did a quick test on 12 light frames, with masterflat, masterbias.

When I don't check the background neutralization in the result window I get

the following view:

imagen

Likely not correct?

Regards,

Mert



   
ReplyQuote
(@tvanpeer)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 23
 

@lammertus As Stefan and I suggested earlier: check the ‘neutralize background’ option.



   
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

Thanks, I already use the background neutralization option.



   
ReplyQuote
(@tvanpeer)
Main Sequence Star
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 23
 

@lammertus And then the result is ok?



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 5464
 

Posted by: @tvanpeer
↑

I think the camera white balance checkbox only applies to DSLRs and system cameras. I wouldn’t bother too much about that.

Indeed, the camera white balance and the camera model matrix only apply to regular consumer camera's from Canon, Nikon, Sony etc...

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@mabula-admin)
Universe Admin
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 5464
 

Posted by: @lammertus
↑

Just did a quick test on 12 light frames, with masterflat, masterbias.

When I don't check the background neutralization in the result window I get

the following view:

imagen

Likely not correct?

Regards,

Mert

Hi @lammertus,

In 5) Normalize, what settings do you use? Is the Background neutralization on or not? If it is on, and you get a green result like that, there is certainly a problem here with your data or a bug in APP somehow.

Mabula

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

@mabula-admin Hi Mabula, sorry to have seen your reply soo late! I only got the green result when Normalize background was NOT selected.

So everything is ok,

Thanks for your help!



   
ReplyQuote
(@lammertus)
Neutron Star
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 134
Topic starter  

@tvanpeer Yes, thanks! Just saw your question, I don't enter very often

in the forum.

 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: